A Genius Among Us: The Sad Story of William J. Sidis
Before the terms “Tiger Mom” or “Helicopter Mom” entered our vernacular. Before the moms on “Toddlers and Tiaras” tried to turn their daughters into beauty queens. Before Earl Woods showed off his two year old son Tiger’s golf skills on the Mike Douglas Show. Before Lindsay Lohan’s dad, the mother in Psycho, and every other overbearing parent we know from modern pop culture, there was William J. Sidis and his mom and dad.
Boris and Sarah Sidis were Ukrainian Jewish immigrants who were both brilliant. Having fled the Ukrainian due to political and religious persecution, they decided to settle in New York City. Boris was a psychologist who quickly became known (and somewhat infamous) for his work with hypnosis and his studying of mental disorders. Sarah was a doctor who was one of the only women of her time to earn a medical degree. Both had highly successful careers, but they wanted children. So, on April 1, 1898, Sarah gave birth to the couple’s first child, William James Sidis.
Combining Boris and Sarah’s genes alone should have been enough to produce a very smart child, but they didn’t want merely a smart child. They wanted a genius.
William’s education began in his very first days on Earth. Sarah quit her job practicing medicine to mold their son into the image they had in mind for him. They used the family’s life savings to buy books, supplies, and any other tool they needed to encourage their son. Utilizing Boris’s innovative psychology techniques, William was taught to recognize and pronounce letters from the alphabet within months. He was using words like “door” at six months. He became dexterous enough to feed himself with a spoon at eight months.
His parents were proud of their son, but possibly more proud that Boris’s techniques in teaching his son were working, constantly publishing academic papers showing off their successes. By two years old, William was reading the New York Times and tapping out letters on a typewriter from his high-chair – in both English and French. He wrote one such letter to Macy’s, inquiring about toys.
Unfortunately, his time to act like a child had already passed young William by. Studying seven different languages (French, German, Latin, Hebrew, Greek, Russian, and one he made up himself – Vendergood) and learning a high school curriculum at seven left Billy precious little time to act his age. His parents wanted the whole world to know about their prodigal son, as well as their participation in all of it.
He was accepted into Harvard at age nine, but the university refused to allow him to attend due to him being “emotionally immature.” His parents took this perceived slight to the media and William was front page news in the New York Times. This gave William the notoriety and fame he was not prepared for. Tufts College, though, did admit him and he spent his time correcting mistakes in math books and attempting to find errors in Einstein’s theory of relativity.
His parents pressed Harvard further and when William turned eleven, they relented. William Sidis became a student at one of the most prestigious universities on Earth at the age most kids were perfectly content playing stick ball and not worrying about giving a dissertation on the fourth dimension.
On a freezing Boston January evening in 1910, hundreds gathered to hear the boy genius William Sidis in his first public speaking engagement, a talk about fourth dimensional bodies. His speech, and the fact that it was over most of the audiences’ heads, became national news.
Reporters followed William everywhere on campus. He rarely had a private moment. He graduated from Harvard at the age of 16, cum laude. Despite his success, Harvard was not a happy experience for young Billy. According to Sidis biographer Amy Wallace, William once admitted to college students nearly double his age that he had never kissed a girl. He was teased and humiliated for his honesty. At his graduation, he told the gathered reporters that, “I want to live the perfect life. The only way to live the perfect life is to live it in seclusion. I have always hated crowds.”
After leaving Harvard, society and his parents expected great things from William. He briefly studied and taught mathematics at what later would become known as Rice University in Houston, Texas. His fame and the fact that he was younger than every student he taught made it difficult on him. He resigned and moved back to Boston.
He attempted to get a law degree at Harvard, but he soon withdrew from the program. William, brilliant as he was, struggled with his own self-identity. In May 1919, he was arrested for being a ringleader of an anti-draft, communistic-leaning demonstration. He was put in jail and that’s where he would meet the only woman he would love – an Irish socialist named Martha Foley. Their relationship was rather complicated, mostly due to William’s own declaration of love, art, and sex as agents of an “imperfect life.”
When in court, he announced that he didn’t believe in God, that he admired a socialist form of government, and many of the world’s troubles could be traced back to capitalism. He was sentenced to eighteen months in prison.
Fortunately for him, his parents’ influence kept him out prison, but William decided he’d had enough of “crowds” and wanted his “perfect life.” He moved city to city, job to job, always changing his name to keep from being discovered. During this time, it’s believed he wrote dozens of books under pseudonyms (none of which were particularly well read), including a twelve hundred page work on America’s history and a book entitled “Notes on the Collection of Streetcar Transfers,” an extremely in-depth look at his hobby of collecting streetcar transfers. It was described by one biographer as the “most boring book ever written.” In another of his books, he divulges a theory on what later would become known as “the black hole theory.”
Seclusion fit William just fine. He wanted nothing more than him and his genius to be left alone.
In 1924, no longer talking to his parents and out of contact with anyone who truly cared for him, the press caught up to William. A series of articles were printed describing the mundane jobs and the measly living conditions the supposed-genius William Sidis had. Ashamed and distressed, he withdrew further into the shadows. But the public remained infatuated with the former boy wonder’s apparently wasted talents. In 1937, The New Yorker printed an article titled “April Fool!” which described William’s fall from grace in humiliating detail.
The story resulted from a female reporter who had been sent to befriend William. In it, it described William as “childlike” and recounted a story about how he wept at work when given too much to do. Sidis sued the New Yorker for libel and the case went all the way to the Supreme Court, before they eventually settled seven years later. But the damage had been done. William Sidis, for all the potential he showed as a child prodigy, would never become the man he was supposed to be.
On a summer day in July 1944, William’s landlady found him unconscious in his small Boston apartment. He had had a massive stroke, his amazing brain dying on the inside. He never regained consciousness and was pronounced dead at the age of 46 with a picture of the now-married Martha Foley in his wallet.
If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes, Spotify, Google Play Music, Feed), as well as:
- Listening to Mozart Won’t Make You Smarter
- Albert Einstein Did Not Fail at Mathematics in School
- You Actually Use All of Your Brain, Not 10%
- Robert Downey Jr. Modeled His Portrayal of Tony Stark After Elon Musk, One of the Founders of Zip2, Paypal, Tesla Motors, Solar City, and SpaceX
- Ivan Drago From Rocky IV is Actually a Real Life Genius
- Written by one Frank Folupa (one of William’s pseudonyms), the three-hundred page book about streetcar transfers was so incredibly in-depth that it described all 1600 forms of transfers possible. This is one example of the intricate detail he put into each transfer description, “Stedman transfers: This classification refers to a peculiar type turned out by a certain transfer printer in Rochester, N. Y. The peculiarities of the typical Stedman transfer are the tabular time limit occupying the entire right-hand end of the transfer (see Diagram in Section 47) and the row-and-column combination of receiving route (or other receiving conditions) with the half-day that we have already discussed in detail.” He even coined a word to describe such intense collectors of transfers — a peridromphile.
- Boris Sidis, William’s father, was quite an eccentric in his own right. Besides utilizing the practice of hypnosis in his own psychology work, he applied the theory of evolution and opposed the ideas of eugenics – both minority positions during his time. He became an opponent of Sigmund Freud and eventually was ostracized by the medical community.
- Teddy Roosevelt was one prominent early 20th century individual in favor of eugenics (ironical considering his own long history of medical ailments). At the time, eugenicists in the U.S. (and elsewhere in the world) were performing forced sterilization of the poor, sick, criminals, prostitutes, as well as forced abortions of pregnant women of ill repute or seen as inferior based on certain traits. Roosevelt said of this, “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feeble-minded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them.”
- Besides the obvious one of Adolf Hitler, others who supported this stance included Winston Churchill, Margaret Sanger, H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, and John Harvey Kellogg, among many others. This movement was spurred on and given its name by Sir Francis Galton in 1883, inspired by Galton’s half-cousin Charles Darwin’s work.
- The eugenics movement started to lose its steam thanks to its association with the Nazi party. After WWII, public support for eugenics all but disappeared thanks to this association. That being said, numerous countries still performed forced sterilization after WWII, including the United States with the last forced sterilization there occurring in 1981. Sweden was another example of a country that kept the eugenics torch burning until 1975, forcibly sterilizing some 21,000 people and coercing another 6,000 into “voluntarily” being sterilized.
- Sweden still controversially requires sterilization before sex change operations are allowed. There are a surprisingly large list of countries that kept such programs going for quite some time after WWII, more on this here.
- The word “eugenics” comes from the Greek “eu” meaning “good/well” and “-genēs” meaning “born”.
|Share the Knowledge!|
Well that was utterly depressing.
yes it was. Now I must hang a rope outback and retrieve the word depressing and hang it for all eternity.
Eugenics is a good thing.
Yes, eugenics can help people eliminate inherited illness, and also improve the IQ of people. Sidis is a sad example of the bad effects of Stage Mother (and State Father) parents who try to exploit their children. I hope his cruel parents regretted their treatment of him. Threating a child in order to exploit them doesn’t work.
Ironical? Really? How ironic.
@Unnecessary Adjective: People always complain about that word. I know Americans don’t use it as much as it is elsewhere, but it is a word and not that long ago was more common than “ironic”. 🙂
Oh dear, yet another article on Mr Sidis regurgitating the same old 1930’s media lies that led to his successful lawsuit against them. The facts are here: http://www.sidis.net
Sidis was doing just fine until his father – a psychiatrist using experimental techniques trying to “cure” psychopaths – abducted his son and forced him to receive the same psychiatric treatment as an involuntary patient at his sanatorium. This prevented him from appealing his criminal conviction for taking part in a anti-war protest – an appeal he would most likely have won – and left him “cured” only of his genius on his release nearly 12 months later.
Today this practice of “involuntary” medical treatment – denying the right of the individual to refuse medical treatment – still goes on in America, Canada, Australia and the UK. It is a direct violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Disabled, and is a practice all other Nation signatories to this Convention have now outlawed. Overdiagnosis and malicious diagnosis of mental illness remains at pandemic levels in these countries. Malicious “diagnosis” of the gifted out of sheer bloody minded jealousy is still also a serious threat to anyone with a high IQ in these countries. Mental illness is no longer an illness, but an accusation where the burden of proof is on the accused, there is no trial, and the accused must either admit to their illness at take accept potentially lifelong treatment with dangerous drugs or face imprisonment for life AND be forced to take those drugs anyway.
In Germany for example, if a person administers medical treatment without patient consent they face the possibility of a criminal prosecution.
Sidis’ father should have been convicted of abduction and criminal assault. Sidis should have been permitted to appeal the conviction on the grounds of exercise of his Constitutional right. He would most certainly have been vindicated by a higher Court.
An no, I am not a Scientologist. The case of William Sidis also long preceded Scientology.
I believe Sidis’ father stole his son childhood for the sake of own psychological experiments. However it does not diminish William’s IQ if any.
His parents were awful people.
That was sad.
“Having fled the Ukrainian due to political and religious persecution, they decided to settle in New York City.”
*Ukraine. While it was common in the English language before the fall of the USSR and Ukraine’s Declaration of Independence in 1991, the definite article “the” preceding the name of the country is no longer considered acceptable by most style guides.
Really liked this article. Very well informative
Let kids be kids. Let them play. Let them do the things that would make them happy. Allow them to get dirty. Allow them to make mistakes, because learning starts from mistakes. Childhood only comes once in a while, don’t waste it. Play with your kids.
It’s almost accepted as a fact that it’s more important for a child (no, a person) to be happy than to be a genius. I disagree with the parents of William Sidis, partly because I had a similar (but far less intense) thing happen to me. After watching several videos of when I was about 1 year old, I came to the conclusion that my parents were “prepping me for the baby SAT” as I put it when I was younger. That caused me to never have the curiosity that I observed in other kids (and in depictions of kids in parenting books).
Sidis life is a sad illustration of the Stage Mother Syndrome – where parents thrust their own ambitions on their children. This never works, and creates only hatred and discord. So far as eugenics is concerned, it is a logical way to improve the human race and is compatible with the Darwinian law of survival. Our welfare system deliberately encourages low-IQ people to breed children, with the result that cities end up like Detroit. Do some research and you will find out that low-IQ people have a much higher rate of crime and out-of-wedlock births than high-IQ people.
I totally get it. the transfer ticket book is actually a work of art if you look at it fully. What is really demonstrating is the total fake reality that we deal with everyday. I’m sure there are things that are far more boring than that book. To be honest, people should not have looked at him like a circus act. And that actually shows who’s really stupid: the people humiliating him. All this shows is how insecure they are. If you don’t understand somebody, just leave them alone. You don’t have to make them the bane of your limitations.
All very cogent comments- but remember that society expects the brilliant to live up to their own “expectations”, rather than the person’s own desires. If one chooses not to comply with those expectations, whatever the reason, why do we view that life as a tragic “waste”? If he is happy living that way, what right does anyone have to demand otherwise? The surest route to misery is to attempt to live up to someone elses’ standards while surrounded by people telling you what you “should be”. It is highly corrosive and extremely damaging to the psyche. I say we should all learn from his experience and disavow the delusional belief that “if only _______, I’ll be happy” and stop believing that anyone should be anything other than what they choose to be.