Why British Singers Lose Their Accents When Singing

Deborah Honeycutt August 9, 2013 46
Amy asks: Why is it that when you hear a British musician sing, their accent disappears?

eric-claptonMick Jagger, Elton John, Rod Stewart, Ed Sheeran, Phil Collins and George Michael all grew up in or near London and have very recognizably British accents.  Once on stage, they sing like someone who grew up in New England rather than old.  Yet another example is Adele, who has a lovely speaking voice, a very heavy cockney accent, yet her singing pipes do not indicate her dialect.  One might argue that Adele’s speaking and singing voices were two different people if listening without visuals.  Going beyond the British, we see the same thing with other non-American musicians, such as the Swedish band ABBA, and many others singing in English, yet from various places around the world. It seems like no matter where you’re from, if you’re singing in English, you’re probably singing with an American accent, unless you’re actively trying to retain your native accent, which some groups do.

There are several reasons we notice accents ‘disappearing’ in song, and why those singing accents seem to default to “American”.   In a nutshell, it has a lot to do with phonetics, the pace at which they sing and speak, and the air pressure from one’s vocal chords.  As far as why “American” and not some other accent, it’s simply because the generic “American” accent is fairly neutral.  Even American singers, if they have, for instance, a strong “New Yorker” or perhaps a “Hillbilly” accent, will also tend to lose their specific accent, gravitating more towards neutral English, unless they are actively trying not to, as many Country singers might.

For the specific details, we’ll turn to linguist and author, David Crystal, from Northern Ireland.  According to Crystal, a song’s melody cancels out the intonations of speech, followed by the beat of the music cancelling out the rhythm of speech.  Once this takes place, singers are forced to stress syllables as they are accented in the music, which forces singers to elongate their vowels.  Singers who speak with an accent, but sing it without, aren’t trying to throw their voice to be deceptive or to appeal to a different market; they are simply singing in a way that naturally comes easiest, which happens to be a more neutral way of speaking, which also just so happens to be the core of what many people consider an “American” accent.

To put it in another way, it’s the pace of the music that affects the pace of the singer’s delivery.  A person’s accent is easily detectable when they are speaking at normal speed.  When singing, the pace is often slower.  Words are drawn out and more powerfully pronounced and the accent becomes more neutral.

Another factor is that the air pressure we use to make sounds is much greater when we sing.  Those who sing have to learn to breathe correctly to sustain notes for the right amount of time, and singing requires the air passages to expand and become larger.  This changes the quality of the sound.  As a result, regional accents can disappear because syllables are stretched out and stresses fall differently than in normal speech.  So, once again, this all adds up to singing accents becoming more neutral.

So at this point, you might be wondering if the musicians actually know they are losing their accents when they sing. Working in radio, I’ve contemplated how accents seem to disappear over my 20-year career.   Keith Urban isn’t British, though fans of the Aussie singer swoon over his speaking voice (many women could listen to him read the dictionary) and have noticed that he sounds more American when he sings.  I have spoken to Keith a few times and decided the good-natured Keith wouldn’t mind me posing the question:  How is it you sing differently than you talk?  (Certainly not wanting to offend Keith, I began with a few genuine compliments admiring his genius guitar skills.)  He took it all in stride, laughed, then responded, ‘I don’t know.’  (More like kneh-owww)  ‘Good question,’ he said.  Though I don’t think I have an accent.  I think you do!’  It’s quite reasonable to believe that a Hoosier like me sounds a bit hillbilly to a guy from down under.  Keith could not really explain the mystery behind it, and instead went on to explain why he was wearing black toenail polish the last time I chatted him up in person.  (His wife, Nicole, has since been his inspiration to stop, he says.)  So it would seem, that at least with this sample size of one, the artist in question is not aware of any accent change when he sings. So what about others?

Andy Gibson, a New Zealand researcher at AUT’s University Institute of Culture, Discourse & Communication also believes the change in accent between speaking and singing is not a deliberate one, nor are artists even aware of the change.  A 2010 study he conducted of singers with speaking accents showed indeed that they were not aware that they sounded any different; they felt they were singing naturally.  Crystal says it is unusual for a singer to hold a regional accent through an entire song, resulting in what he calls ‘mixed accents’ for most.

And then there’s Kate Nash, the anti-norm.  The English-singing sensation was an unknown until Lily Allen mentioned her on a MySpace page and now she boasts more than 100,000 followers on twitter.  She didn’t know she had talent until she picked up her first guitar two years ago, and the rest is history.  Nash has garnered success on the music charts, accent and all, and flat out refuses to even attempt to sing with an American accent. She makes no apologies for her background and even themes her lyrics toward an English audience.  She is as English as tea in the afternoon and proud of bucking the trend that so many British artists seem to follow, whether intentionally, or more likely in most cases, not.

Thanks for reading this article!  If you liked it, please share it.  Also, here are a few more you might enjoy:

Bonus Facts:

  • Eeyore’s name is based off the British Cockney dialect version of the phrase “hee-haw”.
  • The guy who did the voice for Optimus Prime also did the voice for Eeyore and was the first person to voice Nintendo’s Mario character.
  • Similar to how their are numerous accents within the generic “American” accent, it’s not quite accurate to simply say “British accent”.  There are quite a few British accents- an amazing amount actually, particularly considering the entire UK could fit into Texas, and England itself is only about the size of Alabama.  A few of the most common “British accents” out there include: Cockney (which was butchered by Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins), Estuary English (Southeast British), West Country (Southwest British), Midlands English, Northern England English, Geordie, and Welsh English, among many others.

Expand for References

Enjoy this article? If so, get our FREE wildly popular Daily Knowledge and Weekly Wrap newsletters:

Subscribe Me To:  | 
Print Friendly
Check Out Our New Book and "Nerdy Stuff" TIFO Shop! »

46 Comments »

  1. John August 9, 2013 at 2:46 am - Reply

    It’s a bit ethnocentric to say the American accent is a neutral one. Neutral to Americans, perhaps.
    Maybe American songs are more prevalent and so are considered ‘standard’, or maybe it’s equally neutral sounding in most accents.

    • Daven Hiskey
      Daven Hiskey August 9, 2013 at 1:00 pm - Reply

      @John: It depends on your definitions and context. To linguists, it’s not ethnocentric at all, evidenced by the fact that both the linguists Crystal (Irish) and Gibson (New Zealand) both use the term “neutral”, as well as “homogenous”, here and equate it to the American accent. Certainly there is neutral British English and neutral Australian English and the like. But when linguists refer to global neutral English, this is more or less the generic American accent. Of course, there are numerous accents within America. But, as noted, even when those with heavy accents within America sing, they still generally default to mostly “neutral”. Essentially, when you lengthen out the pronunciation of words, all those singing in English usually speak with a very similar accent, which is thus considered “neutral”. What would be fascinating is to read a research paper on why exactly the generic North American accent has developed to be mostly neutral on the whole. I’ve not yet been able to find such a paper, unfortunately.

    • Daven Hiskey
      Daven Hiskey August 9, 2013 at 1:22 pm - Reply

      @John: And if you’re curious, neutral British English is known as the “Queen’s English” or “BBC English”. Neutral American English is known as “General American” or “Midland Accent”, owing to the fact that it’s the accent generally found in the regions around Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, and Illinois. And to be clear, there is still some debate among linguists whether it’s accurate to say that General American is the global neutral English accent today. But even those dissenters usually think that at some point General English will be global neutral, even if it’s not already, simply because the General American accent is what’s taught in the vast majority of countries in the world when teaching English, particularly in Asia, but also elsewhere. But, again, I’d love to read a paper on why General American is so globally neutral, seemingly by default. From Gibson (New Zealand), he states that General American is simply the “easiest” way to pronounce things, so when putting in extra pronunciation effort when singing, people naturally gravitate towards this. So, perhaps with the melting pot of America, and general lazy American pronunciation throughout its history, perhaps it just all shook out that way. But it would be fascinating to read a technical explanation from a linguist-historian on this matter.

      • Heilwig August 9, 2013 at 6:35 pm - Reply

        Standard American English and Received Pronunciation (“BBC English”) are only “neutral” in the sense that they are socially perceived as the neutral, “default” variety. They got this way because they were the dialects of the most socially powerful groups (i.e.the upper-class southern English and Americans from the mid-Atlantic states). Other people adopted the accent to advance in society.

        This is all just due to historical accident–if Manchester had become the capital of England 1000 years ago, instead of London, the queen would speak like Noel Gallagher. Global English sounds most like Standard American English because the US is the most powerful country in the world and people worldwide are exposed to American media, not because American English is inherently superior.

        Also, the stereotype that American English is lazier than British English is baseless.You can find examples of “laziness” in any dialect–the British even leave whole syllables out of words like “category” and ‘literally”!

        It is true that singing forces you to lose certain phonetic and phonological features you use in normal speech for the purposes of rhythm, melody, etc. But there’s no inherent reason for it to sound American overall.

        • Stig781 February 10, 2014 at 4:32 pm - Reply

          It’s not anything of the sort Heilwig, the “most powerful and most influential” bunkum is delusional.

          ENGLISH, i.e. correct English, spoken as the English of England speak it, is what permeates far more through the Globe (due to the Commonwealth) than the “Standard American Accent” nonsense ou spout.

      • Kevin August 9, 2013 at 8:04 pm - Reply

        I think you mean that the standard British accent is called the “Received Pronunciation,” not the “Queen’s English” or “BBC English,” both of which refer to the language.

    • TChristy March 20, 2014 at 6:23 am - Reply

      That’s a good point, John. American accents may be “neutral” to Americans but, they are certainly not to English and other British people. They are as distinctive as other, non-English and non-British, foreign accents.

      It’s just another example of American arrogance, thinking that the whole world revolves around their country and that somehow, they own the English language. Here’s a free bit of advice for the article’s author and any other ethnocentric Americans. The English language does not come from America. It comes from England in the UK. The clue is in the name!

      An actual, neutral English would be more like English pronunciation in England, without a regional accent.

      • daooch April 5, 2014 at 6:38 pm - Reply

        And you get your linguistics degree from ….. where? smh

  2. MarkS August 9, 2013 at 4:16 am - Reply

    I don’t accept this explanation at all, because there are large numbers of singers with British regional accents, and have always been. Perhaps they just don’t sing the kind of songs the writer of this article listens to.

    The real explanation is simply that they want to sell to the American market, or that they think that sounding American is ‘cool’.

    • Kevin August 9, 2013 at 8:17 pm - Reply

      Good grief, why so defensive? How does one deliberately sing in an “American” (or neutral) accent?

      The article makes some good points about how singing lengthens many of the sounds, which makes the pronunciation sound more neutral. Something interesting that differentiates many accents is rhoticity, or the pronunciation of the “r” sound. Many accents, including the Received Pronunciation (i.e., “British accent”) and American accents such as the New York (“New Yawk”) City and Boston accents, don’t pronounce the “r.” Yet the “r” is actually two sounds! You have to pronounce it as “ah-rr.” Now imagine singing that for a long note!

      Celine Dion clearly has a French-Canadian accent in her speech and singing. In “My Heart Will Go On,” she sings with a non-rhotic accent, as it should be sung. But I’ve always felt that she mispronounces a single word, “there’s.” (In the line: “You’re here, there’s nothing…”) See the part beginning at 3:15 in the video linked below:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmbw8OycJrE

      • MarkS August 10, 2013 at 11:43 am - Reply

        If you think that’s defensive, I wonder what you’d call attacking? :)

        I felt provoked to respond by the combination of massive arrogance and massive ignorance in this article.

        “How does one deliberately sing in an “American” (or neutral) accent?” Easily! Some non-Americans do it all the time. It’s easier to do it in singing than in speaking, but I’ve heard both. Do you honestly imagine that people can’t fake accents?

        Secondly, an American accent is NOT, repeat NOT, neutral… except to Americans!

        Everybody, from every country and with every kind of accent, considers their own speech neutral. Everybody feels that they don’t have an accent themselves, only others do. But I guess most Americans are too insulated from the rest of the world to know this.

        • Daven Hiskey
          Daven Hiskey August 10, 2013 at 4:56 pm - Reply

          @MarkS: I think you are misinterpreting what “neutral” means to a linguist.

          • Heilwig August 10, 2013 at 6:44 pm -

            Actually, the idea of a phonetically/phonologically “neutral” language variety is utterly meaningless to linguists.

        • TChristy March 21, 2014 at 8:14 am - Reply

          That’s an excellent point, Mark S. American accents are certainly not neutral, to English people. They stand out as foreign, just as much Indian and Mexican accents do.

          It’s a matter of perspective. From an American perspective, they will seem neutral because that is what Americans are used to hearing and using themselves.

  3. MarkS August 9, 2013 at 4:45 am - Reply

    Just to add to that:

    Ever heard Gilbert and Sullivan operettas sung by British singers?

    Opera in English sung by British singers?

    Scottish and Irish songs sung for the Scots and Irish themselves, not for Americans?

    Victorian songs, sung full-voice in cut-glass accents?

    Her’s one to start you off. “I’ll Walk Beside You”, sung by Webster Booth
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrLBbznmCt8

  4. MarkS August 9, 2013 at 5:02 am - Reply

    How about a Scottish accent?

    The Corries singing Flower of Scotland to a Scottish audience.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyx1xeZo_tk

  5. MarkS August 9, 2013 at 5:05 am - Reply

    Irish?

    Clancy Brothers – “The Rising of the Moon ”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwHm18K3kjs

  6. MarkS August 9, 2013 at 6:20 am - Reply

    This is a good one!

    Mary-Jess Leaverland singing “Abide With Me” at the FA Cup Final last year. (Traditionally sung before major sporting events in the UK, if you don’t know.)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSKlNobo-Ck

    Did it really not occur to you that Keith Urban was embarrassed and changed the subject because he didn’t want to admit deliberately singing in an American accent for American audiences?

  7. Heilwig August 9, 2013 at 6:57 pm - Reply

    There are several obvious reasons why this doesn’t make sense.

    1) Classical singers generally have better technical vocal skills than pop singers. So if this phenomenon is due to the *technical* requirements of singing, why don’t British opera singers, church choirs, folk singers, etc sing in American accents like the pop singers?

    2) This phenomenon only dates back to the 1950s/60s. Did the technical requirements of singing suddenly change in the middle of the 20th century? Is it just coincidence that American pop music became popular in Britain in this period?

    3) Just because some singers do it unconsciously doesn’t mean there must be a physical, technical explanation. People unconsciously switch dialects all the time–you might use a regional accent with your friends but a standard accent in formal situations, without necessarily noticing that your speech has changed. There’s no physical reason for this.

    4) Do you really think that the dialect which is most socially powerful and internationally widespread due to US media just so happens to also be objectively the most neutral and natural?

    5) What on earth would it even mean for a dialect to be phonetically/phonologically “neutral”????
    Is it neutral compared to other languages as well, or just other varieties of English?

    It is possible that the mechanics of singing favor certain phonetic and phonological features which happen to be present in Standard American English. But that doesn’t mean that Standard American English as a whole is objectively superior for singing.

    A phonetician could probably point out some more technical reasons why this is nonsense, but the social reasons seem obvious enough.

    • this guy makes sense December 19, 2013 at 3:50 am - Reply

      Through all the noise lacking any logic or rationality ()including the article) this guy cracked it. Any brits trying to put it down to technical reasons are singers that attain (whether intentionally or not) an america accent. Denial is a fascinating thing.

      Ps. Im british. Go on Kate nash and arctic monkeys!!!

  8. TJ August 9, 2013 at 10:33 pm - Reply

    The old rockers had to Yankeefy their voice and songs to get played on the US radio. Back then and even now most new singer in English copy from old singer and they all had American accent.

  9. jules August 10, 2013 at 10:23 am - Reply

    i’ll be cross-posting this to a bad linguistics website, and tagging it ‘US Vanity’

    • MarkS August 10, 2013 at 10:31 am - Reply

      :-D

  10. anon August 10, 2013 at 9:53 pm - Reply

    Oh, bull. *Some* accent reduction is just because of how music is, but my accent mostly stays when I sing. If an American regional accent won’t totally disappear, a non-American one sure won’t!
    Also, a lot of music is sung non-rhotically (without Rs at the end of words), and thus technically would make American singers sound British. Personally, I just sing how I speak, rhoticity and all, and don’t try to sound like music is “supposed” to.

  11. Warren August 11, 2013 at 8:45 pm - Reply

    It would appear that a tender english nerve has been touched by the author. As an American, I have noticed and often wondered why so many British pop “singers” don’t actually sound very British. This article merely attempts to offer a reason beyond the untenable notion that it’s always deliberate. There is absolutely NOTHING mentioned or hinted in the subject matter to suggest a superiority with regard to the American accent. Scots and Irish singing Celtic verses with their native accents does NOT explain why Elton John or Dire Straits often sound as if they hail from rural West Virginia. English accents are the grandiose and abominable product of petty one-upmanship in that society involving the grossly affected use of speech that has truly spanned the centuries, and hence forms the very substrate of english culture. Articles like these give no offense to a rational people. The english should finally grow the f@%k up!

  12. MarkS August 13, 2013 at 1:53 am - Reply

    Is this a typical American response? If you can’t come up with rational arguments, then descend into abuse, insults, arrogance and swearing.
     
    You seem to be under the impression that non-American accents are ‘affected’ while the American accent is ‘natural’. This is simply ignorance. Speaking and singing in British accents is as natural, normal and unaffected to speakers of British English, as South African accents are to South Africans, Australian accents to Australians, and American accents to Americans.
     
    And, yes, Americans DO speak with an accent as far as other English speakers are concerned. To many non-Americans, the American accent sounds harsh and twangy, besides being spoken too loudly and too slowly. I’m not trying to be unpleasant. That’s a plain fact, not a value statement. That’s how American sounds to non-Americans.
     
    I wonder why you find the idea untenable that non-Americans use fake American accents to sell their performances to Americans? Is it that you don’t like the idea of smart foreigners tailoring their accents to fool Americans and make more money?
     
    Let’s consider actors as well as singers, because that shows the situation even more clearly.
     
    Compare Emma Watson’s natural accent in the Harry Potter movies with the American accent she puts on in “The Bling Ring” or “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”.
     
    Or listen to Charlize Theron’s flawless American accent when working in America, even though she grew up speaking English with a South African accent. She reverts to her normal, unaffected South African accent any time she visits her home country.
     
    How about Christian Bale, Gary Oldman, Daniel Day-Lewis, Kate Winslet, Heath Ledger, Hugh Laurie, Dominic West, etc.? They all work in fake American accents so successfully that I suspect the majority of Americans don’t even realise they are British.
     
    Compare Christian Bale in this interview as a teenager, using his natural, unaffected accent, with his American accent in the Batman movies.
     
    Notice that he is speaking much more softly and much faster than the American interviewer. This is why, for non-Americans, American accents sound too loud and too slow.
     
    Dozens and dozens of prominent actors use fake American accents with great success. It’s no different with singers.
     
    There is more money in American accents, that’s all there is to it.

    • Warren August 13, 2013 at 3:34 pm - Reply

      Here’s another “typical” American response:

      Aware that your own pop singers often sound American while singing, frightened of any American use of the English language, or anything American at all, taken as an international standard in lieu of looking to the British by default, never skipping a beat in assailing Americans online to offset frustrations arising from cultural insecurities further inflamed by the still fresh amputation of worldly influence and importance, resentment that any residual influence that you can yet project is so much dependent upon its propping up by Hollywood/American media as well as by letting England tag along with our latest military adventures – as if some charm dug from the dirt of a by-gone era; (There wouldn’t even be that were you not, as well, pained with our singular development as a country with such considerable political autonomy.) the admittedly ill-conceived use of the word “neutral” to describe the Standard American accent by an amateur American author so arouses your ire, you demonstrate your misapprehension of his point and bless us all with a series of dull emotional yammering. The tone of each typifies the English superiority complex with which your people so often and disingenuously obscure with ceaseless knee-jerk impugnation of Americans.

      We Americans do have an exaggerated opinion of ourselves on some seemingly holistic level. It was likely necessary for the successful amalgamation of settlers from so many different European countries. It had the curious effect of turning our gaze inward relative to the sniveling pompous outward side glances that mark your own view of the world around you. It does seem to shock you that we are in some ways so alien to you.

      Your excessive striving for superiority as compensation for nagging fears of any possible evident inferiorities is a habit the English have demonstrated repeatedly over the years in internet forums and chat rooms.
      You and others sought either consciously or otherwise, to give offense while comfortably enveloped in a safety blanket woven of righteous pretenses. You succeeded. I merely wanted to bring that to your attention and you’ve no need to thank me.

      • John August 13, 2013 at 7:36 pm - Reply

        *Assumes all these writers are English (what, other countries speak English?)
        *Assumes comments are due to English inferiority complex rather than American superiority complex
        *Only has to bring up WWII to complete the predictable response checklist

        • Daven Hiskey
          Daven Hiskey August 13, 2013 at 7:44 pm - Reply

          @John: The funny part is about half my writers are British, and this sort of thing comes up a lot on both sides of the argument. You should see the comments on the article on the origin of the word “soccer”. ;-) Needless to say, what I’ve learned from this is that a small percentage of each of the American and British populations absolutely nail the stereotypes, but most on both sides of the pond are more or less the same- we all also can at times be pricks. ;-)

      • Stig781 February 10, 2014 at 4:27 pm - Reply

        America is the colony, Warren, it has tagged along with Britain’s “military adventures” for nearly 150 years, and has nothing to do with Hollywood. Your inferiority complex is rather bizarre; your importance is propped up by British culture and language.

        • Warren April 5, 2014 at 5:06 am - Reply

          stig781, tag along for “nearly 150 years”? There were no military joint ventures between the USA and Britain prior to the latter drawing Americans into WWI – to avoid bending to very fair but humiliating peace overtures from Germany in 1916. How bizarre and vainglorious is your England-centric world view. It appears none of your sniveling compatriots (assuming you’re english) descend on your comment like flies on rotting meat to challenge your farcical vanity. Could you explain in some detail your premises, if you dare? I’m curious to know more about your own little world.

  13. MarkyMark September 30, 2013 at 12:02 pm - Reply

    Well I’m Irish so I’ll give a fresh perspective. I think the American accent has permeated our culture through TV and radio. Here in Dublin, gaggles of middle-class school kids have developed a strong twang to their accents and inflect towards the end of every sentence, making them sound like vapid sorority girls. This has only happened in the last 2 decades with more and more exposure to American reality shows, sitcoms and pop music.

  14. Sahar October 10, 2013 at 11:10 am - Reply

    Adele does sing in an accent that sounds American, but only because she rolls her “rs” the way americans do, BUT, you can tell she’s English by the way she pronunciates certain words such as “love” and “us”… and any other word with U in it… also have you heard her albums? Such as “Melt my Heart to stone”? She clearly sounds English.
    Also… Ed Sheeran? REALLY!? Have you actually listened to ANY of his songs? You need me, I don’t need you, Lego House, The A-Team… and so on. ” ’cause we’re jUst Under the Upper hand, go mad for a coUple grams…” quintessentially English my friend. Also, why are we forgetting about David Bowie, Coldplay, The Smiths, Lilly Allen, Kasabian, The Clash, The jam, The Coral, Arctic Monkeys, Blur, Oasis, Radiohead, The BEATLES, The Cure, T-REX, Frank Turner, Kate Bush, The Kinks, Stone Roses, Joy Division, Jamie T, Sex Pistols, Laura Marling, Ian Dury, The Fratellis, Belle and Sebastian, The Wombat, Happy Mondays, Mumford and Sons, Pulp, the Buzzcocks, Echo and the Bunnymen, MIA, New Order, the Specials, The Libertines, and so many more… naming 7 acts, two of which are a shamble, and saying that Kate Nash is the only exception is shoddy research… terrible article.

  15. Pierre January 31, 2014 at 5:05 pm - Reply

    Some singers do sound british, like lily allen or kate nash

  16. Marie February 11, 2014 at 9:57 pm - Reply

    I don’t understand the complexes, either. America doesn’t see Britain as a tag-along war chum and you guys don’t look anything like a puppy! It’s a terrible thing, this perception.

    But I agree. British singers sound American in song, even when they are not trying to. People have known that for forever and I think it’s adorable. We can’t sound British, without much effort, if our lives depended on it. It’s just one more cute connection between the countries.

  17. Yacin February 20, 2014 at 8:14 am - Reply

    I’m french and the canadians singers ( like Celine Dion) who sing in french have no accent when they sing although when they speak it’s totally different, they have a very strong and different accent. So, I guess it’s the same in english :p

  18. Miguel March 9, 2014 at 9:53 am - Reply

    “She is as English as tea” – does it mean she isn’t english at all?

    The 5 o’clock tea tradition was a portuguese court tradition. It was introduced in the UK by the portuguese princess Catarina de Bragança, after her arrival to get married to King Charles II.

    Along with her other belongings, was a trunk full of tea and it’s said that a cup of tea was the first thing she asked for, when she set foot in the UK for the first time, in May13th 1662.

    She also took the orange jelly that gave rise to the English “marmelade” which name derives from the portuguese word “marmelada” a jelly made from quince (marmelo).

    She also introduced some more civilized habits like the use of porcelain dishes as a substitute of the silver and gold ones, where food became cold quickly, used until then, in the british court…

  19. Lewis March 18, 2014 at 2:13 am - Reply

    No – else they would sound like rednecks.. Its obvious their accents complement the British because obviously we are far superiour haha.

  20. ThisnThat March 18, 2014 at 4:11 pm - Reply

    People getting defensive about the American accent being considered ‘neutral’:

    Stop being butthurt. I have several English, Irish, and French friends, and I have several friends who love to sing. I once asked why they sang in an American accent, and all their answers were the same: It wasn’t intentional. Their response was ‘it’s just the easiest way to sing.’ It just so happened that it sounded American to me. They’re not doing it to make big bucks in America, they’re not doing because they think American is cool, they just sing that way. If you guys have such an issue with it, get over yourselves and listen to people who deliberately keep their dialect. American is Neutral- how do you think it was developed in the first place? All the cultures that came in over the years developed a mixed dialect that is as neutral as possible. If you don’t like that, get more immigrants in your country and see what happens after a hundred+ years.

    • Evan March 18, 2014 at 8:55 pm - Reply

      > Implying that American accent being neutral is a foregone conclusion and not the very thing being argued here
      > Assuming that America is the only country to take large numbers of immigrants
      > Ignoring the fact that a truly ‘neutral’ accent would have a non-rhotic /r/ as few accents outside America and Canada pronounce final r.

    • kn April 4, 2014 at 10:32 am - Reply

      I would say that ‘neutral’ is a rather relative concept. Basically, what’s neutral is what most people feel to be most ‘natural’, or least marked. Though ‘general American’ English might appear ‘neutral’ to many people, I would definitely react to any claim that it completely lacks regional markedness. I’ve grown up in a non-anglophone country, and the English I have been taught in school has been almost completerly based on (Southern) Standard British English – and lots of people in many places of the world would undoubtedly regard that accent as the ‘proper’ or ‘standard’ way of pronouncing English. And lots of people arriving in the US have noticed that their way of speaking is totally different from any form of English they have been exposed to previously. So even if General American may have a wider global currency than any other form of English, it does hardly lack regional connections.

  21. Eileen April 11, 2014 at 12:28 pm - Reply

    In “The Story of English” documentary, they explain that English people speak from the front of their mouths, and Americans from the back of their mouths/throats. That could be why singing from the throat or lungs sounds “American”.

Leave A Response »