Is There Any Difference at all Between Men’s and Women’s Razors and Shaving Creams?

Katy E. asks: Are there any differences between razors and shaving cream for men and women beyond cosmetic?

shaving-productsShaving companies almost universally put out both a men’s and women’s version of each of their products, with the women’s version generally costing quite a bit more. But is there actually any difference between the so-called “gendered razors” and shaving cream or is it all just clever marketing?

We’ll start with whether there is any difference in the razors. The answer to this question largely depends on what exactly you are referring to when you say “razor”. If we’re exclusively talking about the razor blades themselves, then there is, for the most part, no difference whatsoever between men’s and women’s razors, with the one caveat being potential differences in the quality of razor blades between brands. Beyond that, no brand we could find claims to use different designed blades for their gendered products. In fact, companies are not shy about admitting this. For example, a few years ago Gillette issued a press release in which they stated that the blades used in their gendered products are both using the same “blade technology”.

So the blades are the same, what about the rest?  After all, women’s razors are generally more expensive than men’s, so are you getting anything for your extra money? For starters, women typically use razors to shave a much larger surface area than men (18 times as much by some estimates). In anticipation of this, many razors made for women are built with a head that is more rounded and often much larger than a comparable male product. Why?  This extra stuff around the blades generally includes some sort of “guide bar” like device that essentially helps get longer, fine hairs in the right position to be cut. This is done as many women, particularly in the winter, let their leg hairs grow out between shavings. This extra surrounding casing also typically is designed to reduce the likelihood of cutting yourself when shaving quickly as such a large surface area often induces.

On the flip side, the heads of men’s razors are designed to facilitate more accurate facial grooming with smaller heads around the blades, as well as having the blades more tightly packed. This serves to better cut thicker hair commonly found on men’s faces vs. women’s legs, and to cut hair closer to the skin. The downside is that one has to be slightly more careful when shaving if you want to avoid accidentally cutting yourself.

To further facilitate this difference in shaving area, the blades of men’s razors are also often put at more of an oblique angle than women’s razors, along with a different contour of handle. The difference in angle and handle shape allows women to see better what they’re shaving when, for instance, looking down at their legs, vs. men looking straight across into a mirror.

So what about shaving creams? Well, unlike razors, which while extremely similar do have some differences, shaving creams and foams are almost always identical save for two differences- smell and price. The base ingredients of both for a given manufacturer are generally the same, they’re just fragranced and packaged differently depending on who they’re marketed to.

As for why women pay more for theirs (and pretty much all other grooming-related products), this is up for debate.  Consumer Reports did an article on this very phenomenon in 2009, specifically asking various bath product manufacturers why there was such a (often large) price discrepancy, with the responses from all companies leaving something to be desired. The best, or perhaps just the most amusing, was from Nivea, whose equivalent body washes for men vs. women differ in price by about 27%. They claimed the price difference was because the women’s version has “skin-sensation technology”, which apparently isn’t a technology that shows up in the ingredients list.

In an interview with Boston Magazine, Dr. Kristina Vanoosthuyze ,who works at the Gillette Innovation Centre, had this to say when asked about the price difference, “The elastomer materials in the grip points, finger rests, and how women hold the razor are different and more comprehensive. It’s important to make the razor ergonomic to use, because women typically shave in a fairly wet environment. And for women, shaving can be like acrobatics, trying to get the ankles, back of the legs, knees, etc. We want the handle to have good control so she can move it around in her hands.”

This does a fair job of explaining the subtle differences between men’s and women’s razors, but is not quite as satisfactory at giving a firm answer to the posed question about the price difference, other than to imply the slight difference in design is the reason for the large markup. This, at least, is better than Nivea’s explanation.

Perhaps the most reasonably explanation is that proposed by Psychology Today. Lacking any good explanation from the manufacturers, they speculate it is because women are under a lot more pressure to be as well-groomed as possible, so are simply willing to pay more. By making it seem as if the women’s version is superior for women, whether true or not with a given product, they assure most will be willing to pay a markup for the “best”.

So, in the end, with razors, there are some tangible differences that may affect your shaving experience depending on what you’re shaving, and which you prefer may be more a matter of personal preference and shaving technique than your gender. And as for shaving cream- do you like that flowery scent?  You’ll quite literally pay through the nose for it over the more “manly” scented (or men’s unscented) variety, which is often made of the same thing as the women’s version for a given brand.

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy subscribing to our new Daily Knowledge YouTube channel, as well as:

excederinBonus Facts:

  • This markup on women’s products doesn’t just exist in the personal grooming world.  Inch for inch on material, women’s clothing typically costs more than men’s. This is partially because tariffs on men’s and women’s clothing products often differ, with women’s being taxed at higher rates. Of course, this doesn’t usually account for the full discrepancy. In addition, if you go to buy a bottle of Excedrin Menstrual Complete, you’ll find you’ll typically pay about 8% more for the same number of pills as a normal bottle of Excedrin Extra Strength. The kicker is the pills in the two bottles have the exact same active ingredients, in the exact same amounts. But it’s not all about the gender divide here. For instance, Excedrin Migraine gels will cost you about 50 cents more for 100 gels than the regular Extra Strength 100 gel bottle. As with Menstrual Complete, the active ingredients are identical. I suppose the lesson here, beyond once again demonstrating product manufacture costs often have little to do with what consumers pay, is that the more pain someone is in, the more they’re willing to fork out to relieve it.
  • Think it’s weird that Gillette employs a PhD in Dr. Kristina Vanoosthuyze to study shaving? Well, it might blow you away to learn that at that one facility alone where Dr. Vanoosthuyze works, there are more than 150 PhDs working for Gillette, all studying how individuals shave and testing numerous variations on their products to improve people’s shaving experience.  In fact, on average, almost 100 people per day are observed shaving at that facility in Reading. The ProGlide alone was tested on over 30,000 men before making it to market.  Needless to say, given the vast sums of money that can be made in the shaving industry (and that customers are mostly locked into buying some shaving products), hiring the best and brightest to get an edge (sometimes literally) in the industry results in a lot of PhDs being hired by the various manufacturers. Somewhat unfairly, it is humorous to note that the major changes to the razors are almost always just adding another blade to the head with each successive model. 😉
Expand for References
Share the Knowledge! Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrmail
Print Friendly
Enjoy this article? Join over 50,000 Subscribers getting our FREE Daily Knowledge and Weekly Wrap newsletters:

Subscribe Me To:  | 
  • Adam Hovey

    I use women’s razors, men’s hurt like hell!

  • Miki

    I have used men’s razors for the past 10 years. I’ve always preferred them for the closest possible shave. Or, maybe I just don’t like girly stuff. Wonder if I’m missing something from women’s razors though …. I’m probably not going to find out. I like my Gillette Fusion.

  • Barrie

    It appears that shaving products, like many other items used and/or worn by both women and men, are priced higher by manufacturers or service providers, for the simple reason that they can.
    Dress shirts for men can be dry cleaned for less than the same shirt for women, at the same dry cleaning establishment. Canadian lawyers, both female and male, must wear the same costumes in court, including a white dress shirt. Cleaners throughout Canada charge more to the female barristers, even when they are delivered to the shop by one partner (marriage, that is) or other. I guess they decide the woman’s shirts by size…

    • Phil

      Thought the shirt discrepancy was down to the machines they use to press shirts; they were built for men’s shirts, and the smaller, tapered women’s garments are often ill-fitted for the big, manly presses or were otherwise too delicate, such that they would rip if pressed on the same machine. This means they have to be hand-pressed, which is more labor-intensive.
      There are unisex machines available – and demand for them is increasing – but last time I checked, these are slower; 30 pieces an hour, compared to 100 for the other machines, making them less cost effective per item. The technology has to evolve, it makes financial sense to do so.

  • Pingback: Gender Pricing: How Is Sex Discrimination Still Legal? | David v. Goliath:()

  • Blue and Gold Wildcat

    Just tell the truth people.

    It isn’t fair how weare always expecting women to shave their underarms and their legs. Too many double standards and we females fall for it.

    Yes I shave be ause if I didn’t, I’d be talked about. But I would ever talk about another female who did not shave.

  • Pingback: Why Gas Is Priced in Tenths of Cents - funnybuzzfunnybuzz()

  • Funkcor

    It’s simple business economics… Woman shave more and shop more… To make up for the men not buying their products more often these companies designed a plain to ever so slightly increase the product price designed for woman to frankly meet their bottom line and make twice the profit…. If you know woman are buying your products more often… You jack the prices up and your company makes a fuck ton more money off that sheer fact… Then pay a puppet to go out and make up some lie about surface pressure and design quality… Woman’s reasons are plastic… And they are made in factories out of China for pennies despite the product design… Don’t give me that crap it’s all about who can sucker who into paying more dispite the clear fact that all razors cost the same penny on the dollar to make so these companies can make disgusting profits off your aloofness… And men’s faces are just as curvy and sensitive if not more so than woman’s legs so they can shove that crap theory up ther asses too!

  • Samantha Stauf

    I didn’t actually realize there was no detectable difference between Excedrine Menstrual and Extra strength. I definitely need to switch over to the Extra Strength. I can really use that extra money.

    • decwow

      active ingredients are not the only things in there. the menstrual versions (like midol) have other things that help with period symptoms other than just pain. You’ll notice that this article cut out the rest of the ingredients list. I’d be interested to know why, and see what they are.

      • Only active ingredients do anything to you. Inactive ingredients by definition cannot help with any symptoms you’re having.

  • Schurkey

    Every time the word “technology” is used to describe a consumer product, you can be sure that the manufacturer:
    1. Has no respect for you
    2. Is trying to cover-up excessive profits
    3. I hoping you’re too stupid and gullible to notice #1 and #2.