For the Last 1,000 Years, the Same Families Have Owned Most of England
Shortly after the Normans conquered England in 1066, their monarch, William, seized all of the lands, then divvied up control among those soldiers and nobles who helped him defeat the Anglo-Saxons (and keeping a fair bit for himself). However, as dramatic as that was, it is even more shocking that today, most of Britain remains in the hands of the descendants of those early Norman conquerors.
Early England and the Conquest
By the turn of the 11th century, England was a mosaic of Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, Danish and Norman. The Anglo-Saxon Ethelred the Unready initially held the throne, but lost it (twice) to others, and was ultimately succeeded by the Danish King Canute in 1016, with some of Ethelred’s sons (including Edward) fleeing to Normandy.
After the Danish line ended, Edward the Confessor took the throne in 1042, although the king was under the thrall of the powerful Godwins, and near the end of his reign, Harold Godwinsson in particular. Edward died childless, and was succeeded by Harold (now Harold II), but the Normans claimed that he had promised the throne to William of Normandy. To make matters worse, the Norwegian, Harald Hardrada, also sought the English throne, with his claim based on agreement between his predecessor and Canute.
In the fall of 1066, Harald invaded in the north, and Harold defeated him, but then had to quickly head south to meet William who had invaded with his well-trained army of knights and crossbowmen. The poorly-equipped Anglo-Saxons were no match for the Normans, and England was soon conquered.
The very first thing William did after he took the English throne was to declare in 1067 that all lands, which had previous been in the hands of many landowners, belonged exclusively to him. He then instituted feudalism when he began to parcel land out to the loyal soldiers who helped him win the throne.
That brings us to today. According to The Guardian, 70% of Britain’s land remains in the hand of less than 1% of its population, with a mere 160,000 families owning 66% of it. More troubling, Queen Elizabeth II remains the nominal owner of every bit of land in England, and every landowner is technically just a tenant (who pays rent in the form of loyalty).
This is not the only vestige of the Norman Conquest, as the descendants of those early invaders, with names today like Darcy, Percy, Montgomery and Mandeville, remain significantly wealthier (at least 10%) than those who descend from Anglo-Saxon stock.
Furthermore, Norman descendants also enjoy other privileges, including attendance at the best universities. In a recent study that examined the enrollment at Cambridge and Oxford over the last thousand years, it was revealed that at certain times, Norman names were 800% more common at Oxford than in the general population, and more recently, were at least twice as likely to found in that institution’s enrollment.
If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes, Spotify, Google Play Music, Feed), as well as:
- Why the Mass Avoidance of Some Business is Called “Boycotting”
- The Difference Between The UK, England, And Great Britain
- How the United Kingdom Flag Design Came to Be as It is Today
- Why Some Countries Drive on the Right and Some Countries Drive on the Left
- The Man Who Fought in WWII With a Sword and Bow
- According to the Universal Free Press (UFP), in addition to the UK, Queen Elizabeth also is technically the legal owner of the land in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Her total ostensible personal holdings far exceed 4,000 million acres and comprise 1/6 of all the land in the world. (Of course, if she actually tried to take the land back, one would imagine she’d quickly find herself no longer a monarch). The UFP lists the next largest landowners, in order (by million acres), as the Russian government (2,447), the Chinese government (2,365), the U.S. federal government (760) and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (553).
- Well over half of the land in many western states, including Alaska, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Oregon and Arizona, is publicly owned. In 2013, among the largest individual landowners in the U.S. were (in acres): John Malone (2, 200,000), Ted Turner (2,000,000) and Brad Kelley (1,500,000).
- Home ownership in the U.S. has been in a steady decline since the “Great Recession” hit. In 2007, at the height of the housing bubble, about 73% of Americans owned their own home, while in 2012, that number had dropped to 62%. Home ownership rates in Canada are believed to have seen a similar decline.
- In the U.K., home ownership (not necessarily land) has also declined to historically low levels with the owner-occupation rate in 2012 at 64.7%.
- Home ownership in Australia is at 67%, with those having a mortgage increasing over the last 15 years from 25.5% to 34.9%, and those owning their home outright decreasing from 40.9% to 32.1%.
- 1,000 years after they invaded, you still need a Norman name to get ahead
- Ethelred II
- High house prices? Inequality? I blame the Normans
- Home ownership
- Home ownership in the U.S. versus Canada
- If you’re named Darcy, you’re likely to be one of the privileged rich
- KS3 Bitesize History – Norman Conquest
- Land Report 100
- Public and Private Land Percentages
- Queen Elizabeth II owns 1/6 of Earth’s land
- U.K. homeownership falls
- U.S. Homeownership Hits Decade Low
|Share the Knowledge!|
“The poorly-equipped Anglo-Saxons were no match for the Normans, and England was soon conquered”
If you put things like that, which don’t match up with what the majority of historians will tell you, it leads to doubt in the mind of the reader as to what else in your article might be incorrect.
What nonsense. It took William two decades before he had the country under his control.
In fact, no offence, but this may be one of the poorly constructed articles i’ve ever read on the subject. ‘turn on the 11th c England was a mosaic of celtic, dane, anglo saxon and norman’. The Normans were in Normandy until 1066. At a stretch you could say Edward had Norman advisors in his counsel, but that wasnt until his rule much later. The Celts were not in England, Cornwall apart, and no where else in England did they have any kind of governance or prominence. there may have been Celtic blood in the DNA, but not in the rule or the culture.
Sorry, but this article is very very badly informed, and any reader is advised to discard it and seek better elsewhere.