{"id":41838,"date":"2016-03-29T00:05:50","date_gmt":"2016-03-29T07:05:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=41838"},"modified":"2016-03-28T23:48:19","modified_gmt":"2016-03-29T06:48:19","slug":"why-are-they-called-nicknames","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2016\/03\/why-are-they-called-nicknames\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Are Certain Alternate Names Called Nicknames?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Carla T. asks: When someone has an alternate name than their legal one that they go by, why is it called a “nick”name?<\/div>\n

\"language2\"<\/a>A form of nickname <\/em>has been around since the early 14th century- eke name, <\/em>literally meaning “an additional name.”
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Eke <\/em>is an even older word, dating back to about 1200 meaning “to increase.” (Eke <\/em>also meant “to lengthen,” and it was this meaning that eventually became the meaning of to eke out<\/em> or make just enough.)<\/p>\n

The first documented instance of “eke name” comes from the 1303 Middle English devotional Handlyng Synne<\/em>, by Robert Manning of Brunne.\u00a0 In it, he states on line 1531 to 1534, “As moche \u00fean he ys to blame \u00deat \u021deue\u00fe a man a vyle ekename<\/strong> \u021cyf hys ry\u021dt name be withdrawe Gostlych\u00eb…”<\/p>\n

So how did we get “nickname” from “ekename”?\u00a0 This is one of the numerous examples of metanalysis or rebracketing. In this case, “an ekename” became “a nekename” and ultimately, today, “a nickname.”<\/p>\n

We can see this transformation starting in the 1440 work Promptorium Parvulorum<\/em> (“Storehouse for Children,” the first English to Latin dictionary) by Geoffrey the Grammarian of England, where it states “Neke name, or eke name, agnomen.” Similarly, the 1483 English to Latin dictionary Catholicon Anglicum<\/em> has an entry: “An Ekname, agnomen.”<\/p>\n

We see another incarnation of this in Sir Thomas More’s Confutation of Tyndale’s Answer<\/em> published in 1532:<\/p>\n

I shoulde here call Tindall by another name:\u2025it were no nyck name<\/strong> at all and yet would there some then say that it were not honest so to do; and this will some such folk say as in the villainous words of his spoken by this blessed sacrament will find no fault at all.\u00a0 But meseemeth surely that at the first hearing of such a shameful word spoken by the mouth of such a shameless heretic by this holy sacrament of Christ, the whole Christian company present should not be able to contain themselves from calling him “knave” all with one voice at once.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Fast-forwarding a bit to the 17th century, we find several instances of the more modern “nick-” spelling, such as in the 1617 Itinerary<\/em> by Fynes Moryson, where it states, “James Fitz-thomas\u2025was by a nicke-name called the Suggon Earle…”<\/p>\n

Within a century of this, “nick-name,” “nick name,” and “nickname” became relatively commonly used in place of older variants and the original “eke name,” with the latter being phased out completely.<\/p>\n

A similar example of this type of rebracketing can be seen in how we got “another” (and, sometimes “nother” in such phrases as “a whole nother”) from “an other.” Or going the other way, how we got “apron” from the original “napron” (“a napron” being rebracketed to “an apron”) and “umpire” from “noumpere” (“a noumpere” being rebracketed to “an oumpere”).<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n