{"id":36226,"date":"2014-10-22T00:00:59","date_gmt":"2014-10-22T07:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=36226"},"modified":"2014-10-11T18:52:49","modified_gmt":"2014-10-12T01:52:49","slug":"day-history-october-22nd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2014\/10\/day-history-october-22nd\/","title":{"rendered":"This Day in History: October 22nd- The Man Who Refused a Nobel Prize"},"content":{"rendered":"

This Day In History<\/a>: October 22, 1964<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Jean-Paul_Sartre\"<\/a>On October 22, 1964, existentialist author Jean Paul Sartre was awarded the prestigious Nobel Prize for literature, which he chose to decline. His refusal was not an impulsive decision, but rather one based on longstanding personal and objective considerations. Sartre had also turned down the French Legion of Honor, as well as other accolades and honors in the past, so the folks on the Nobel committee were in pretty good company.<\/p>\n

Sartre\u2019s work advanced the philosophy of existentialism – the belief that each person must create meaning in their own life because life itself is essentially meaningless. He was a professor of philosophy in Le Havre, Laon, and Paris, and published his first novel Nausea<\/em><\/a> in 1938. He fought in World War II and later worked with the French Resistance. In 1942, Being and Nothingness<\/em><\/a> was published, which turned out to be his best known work.<\/p>\n

In a statement to the Swedish press explaining his rationale for declining the Nobel Prize, Sartre said,<\/p>\n

This attitude is based on my conception of the writer\u2019s enterprise. A writer who adopts political, social, or literary positions must act only with the means that are his own\u2014that is, the written word. All the honors he may receive expose his readers to a pressure I do not consider desirable. If I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre it is not the same thing as if I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre, Nobel Prize winner.<\/p>\n

The writer must therefore refuse to let himself be transformed into an institution, even if this occurs under the most honorable circumstances, as in the present case.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Although very diplomatic in his response in 1964, Sartre let his true feelings be known in the 1976 documentary film Sartre By Himself, where he\u2019s a bit more blunt: \u201cBecause I was politically involved the bourgeois establishment wanted to cover up my ‘past errors.’ Now there\u2019s an admission! And so they gave me the Nobel Prize. They ‘pardoned’ me and said I deserved it. It was monstrous!\u201d<\/p>\n

Sartre, always an active champion of left-wing social issues, had been pardoned by French President De Gaulle for his part in the 1968 uprisings. \u201cYou don\u2019t arrest Voltaire,\u201d De Gaulle supposedly said.<\/p>\n

Just the sort of remark that intimated Sartre was an institution, and the very reason he declined to accept the Nobel Prize.<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n