{"id":22475,"date":"2013-06-04T17:21:28","date_gmt":"2013-06-05T00:21:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=22475"},"modified":"2013-06-04T17:21:28","modified_gmt":"2013-06-05T00:21:28","slug":"what-causes-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2013\/06\/what-causes-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids\/","title":{"rendered":"What Causes Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gina asks: What causes SIDS and how can it be prevented?<\/div>\n

\"sleeping-baby\"<\/a>Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is every new parent’s fear. It’s defined as \u201cthe sudden death of an infant under age 1 that cannot be explained after a thorough investigation has been conducted, including a complete autopsy, an examination of the death scene, and a review of the clinical history\u201d.<\/p>\n

In the early 1970s the US government became concerned at the number of infant deaths that couldn’t be explained. This led to The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Act of 1974<\/em> which gave power, and funding for research, to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHHD) to find the cause. Fast forward to today and we still haven’t definitively proven what the root cause of SIDS is. However, we do know that it’s most likely the result of a simultaneous occurrence of multiple events- a perfect storm of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that leads to dead babies. This theory seems to be the most widely accepted and was first put forth by Dr.’s JJ Filiano and HC Kinney at Boston’s Children’s Hospital in 1994. Known as the \u201ctriple risk model\u201d, it states that in almost every case of SIDS, there are three factors in play- a vulnerable infant, a critical developmental period in homeostatic control, and exogenous stressors.<\/p>\n

That might sound like a bunch of \u201cdoctor speak\u201d for \u201cI really don’t know why your baby is dead\u201d (and yes, I’ll explain it in English shortly), but the truth is, based on this model, the NICHHD came up with an education plan called the \u201cback to sleep\u201d program. The results have helped reduce the cases of SIDS by over 50% since the early 1990s. It might seem like this type of tragedy is now rare and can be overlooked when it comes to what we should worry about with newborns. After all, I would much rather worry about how to keep poop from leaking out the sides of the diaper. (Seriously, it’s gross.)\u00a0 The truth, however, is SIDS is still the leading cause of death in children under the age of 1, accounting for about .67 deaths per 1,000 live births in the US. Because almost no one likes dead babies, let’s look at these three factors and why they come together to form this perfect storm of SIDS tragedy.<\/p>\n

The first factor in the \u201ctriple risk model\u201d is a vulnerable infant. What does that mean? It all comes down to breathing and how the brain controls it. The body has a respiratory center in the brain located in an area known as the Medulla Oblongata and the Pons regions. If you were sleeping (almost all cases of SIDS involve and infant who was sleeping prior to being found dead) these areas get information from what are known as chemoreceptors. These receptors are responsible for regulating our breathing so just the right amount of oxygen gets in, and the right amount of carbon dioxide gets out (despite the voluntary things that control breathing). One of the nerve groups involved with the chemoreceptors (and helps influence the respiratory drive, blood pressure, temperature regulation, upper airway reflexes, and arousal) is called the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neurons. They also are responsible for regulating long term breathing in response to low oxygen levels (hypoxia).<\/p>\n

Several studies have shown that, in almost all SIDS cases, the infant had abnormal 5-HT neurons. Specifically, they had a higher number of neurons and a greater overall neuron density. They also had lower numbers of receptor sites for the neurotransmitters that send the signals to breathe. These abnormal neurons will not work appropriately if the baby was put in a situation where these nerves were controlling breathing, like when sleeping, and the infant was put in a hypoxic state, like lying face down in the crib and breathing into a loose comforter, stuffed animal, pillow or the like. These studies also showed that males had significantly lower numbers of neurotransmitter receptor site binding than females. This is important ancillary evidence, as males are more likely to be a victim of SIDS than females.<\/p>\n

The second factor in \u201cthe triple risk\u201d model is a critical period in the development of homeostatic control. Basically, in English, this means the baby is most likely less than 1 year of age. This is because the period in which the baby is developing the respiratory centers of the medulla are within the first year. “Homeostatic control” is just a fancy way of saying that area is controlling the oxygen and carbon dioxide levels appropriately.<\/p>\n

The third factor in the \u201ctriple risk model\u201d is exogenous stressors. What are those? Anything that might cause the baby to be in a state of hypoxia, or have elevated levels of carbon dioxide in their system. So things like sleeping face down, covering the baby’s head while sleeping, using bulky blankets and pillows, allowing the child to share a bed with others, bundling up the infant too closely to their face, piling stuffed animals or toys around the baby, and illness just prior to death.<\/p>\n

Among other indicators, evidence that this \u201ctriple risk model\u201d is correct can be found in a study published in 2010 in the Journal of the American Medical Association<\/em>. It showed that 95% of SIDS cases had 1 or more of these risk factors, 88% had 2 or more, and 95% had at least 1 exogenous stressor.<\/p>\n

So how can you reduce the risk of SIDS in your baby? We can’t know ahead of time if our child has a 5-HT abnormality, and we can’t change that our babies are developing their respiratory centers during their 1st<\/sup> year of life. So the only way for us to try to prevent SIDS is to try and control the exogenous stressors.<\/p>\n

The \u201cback to sleep\u201d (also known as “Safe to Sleep”)\u00a0 program recommends that you only allow your baby to sleep on their backs. Do not allow the baby to sleep in the bed with you, rather have them sleep in the crib next to you. Use only tight fitting sheets and blankets in the crib (nothing loose and otherwise keep the crib empty). Allow for the use of a pacifier, as this will help in the aid of respiratory control. The use of a fan to circulate the air in the room has also been linked with decreased SIDS instances.\u00a0 Stop smoking. There is a 2-5 fold increase in the risk of SIDS if the mother smokes. Finally, breast feed or otherwise feed your baby breast milk any way you can.\u00a0 Beyond the numerous other proven benefits of this over formula, several studies have shown up to a 50% decrease in the risk of SIDS if the baby is breastfed.<\/p>\n

In the end, to answer your “what causes SIDS” question in a single sentence, the most likely cause of SIDS is an abnormality in the 5-HT neurons that does not allow for the baby to restore appropriate oxygen and carbon dioxide levels while being stressed by outside factors that cause states of asphyxia. Phew! That sentence is a mouthful. Feel free to memorize it so you can impress your friends the next time the \u201cwhat causes SIDS\u201d question comes up!\u00a0 And then re-read the above full explanation a few times, so you can back up your awesome medically sounding one sentence answer with an English explanation.<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n