{"id":21415,"date":"2013-05-13T14:22:00","date_gmt":"2013-05-13T21:22:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=21415"},"modified":"2013-05-13T14:22:51","modified_gmt":"2013-05-13T21:22:51","slug":"the-origin-of-the-name-condom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2013\/05\/the-origin-of-the-name-condom\/","title":{"rendered":"The Origin of the Word “Condom”"},"content":{"rendered":"
J. Rice asks: Why do we call condoms, “condoms”?<\/div>\n

\"condoms\"<\/a>Whether one knows them as johnnys, rubbers, raincoats, jimmy hats, or the demure \u201cprotection\u201d, people the world over know a condom when they see one. Established monikers notwithstanding, the origin of the word “condom” remains a matter of some historical uncertainty. The most commonly told tale has the origin of the word in its supposed creator, Dr. Condom. The fabled Dr. Condom, a physician living during the reign of Charles II, apparently sought to do his patriotic duty by creating and popularizing a device intended to protect the, ahem, Crown Jewels.<\/p>\n

However, both etymologists and historians have dismissed the Dr. Condom story, and with good reason. Condoms were being used long before Charles II\u2019s reign (1660-85). The oldest contender for first recorded condom use can be found in the French Grotte des Combarrelles<\/i>, a cave with drawings, some 12,000 to 15,000 years old, displaying condom use. Other archaeological evidence finds evidence of silken, oiled paper condoms in ancient China, and tortoise shell and animal horn condoms in ancient Japan (possibly having some bearing on the origins of the word “horny”, a theory yet unconfirmed). This, in tandem with the fact that no amount of etymological excavation can find any historical record of a Dr. Condom, makes said doctor at best, a Johnny come lately, and a worst (read: probably), fiction.<\/p>\n

However, the condom’s name origins remain as shady as Dr. Condom\u2019s, with the word\u00a0appearing seemingly\u00a0out of thin air in a 1666 English Birth Rate Commission report,\u00a0which found\u00a0that the use of “condons”, had put a recent dent in the fertility rate. Hot on the heels of the report, in 1705 a\u00a0letter referred to the 2nd Duke of Argyll, John Campbell, as arriving in London, and bearing on his person, a<\/p>\n

Certaine instrument called a Quondam, qch. occasioned ye debauching of a great number of Ladies of qualitie…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The word quickly made it into public print, courtesy of John Hamilton Belnavis\u2019 1706 poem, A Scottish Answer to British Vision<\/i>. A political opponent to the aforementioned Duke of Argyll, Belnavis, rebutting the Duke\u2019s vision of Scottish and British unification, penned a verse that was no doubt stinging by 18th<\/sup> century standards:<\/p>\n

When Reasoning\u2019s answer\u2019d
\nBy seconded Votes,
\nAnd speeches are banter\u2019d
\nBy outfield turn-coats,
\nThen Sirenge and Condum
\nCome both in request,
\nWhile virtuous Quondam
\nIs treated in Jest.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

By 1717, it seems that the term had become well established, with British physician Daniel Turner launching written condemnations of condom use in his tome, Syphilis. A Practical Dissertation on the Venereal Disease<\/i>. While this was to serve as the opening salvo in one of the first debates within both the public and medical community as to the ethics of condom use and the condom market, the term, and the condom, were already popular commodities. Giacomo Casanova, arguably the most famous, and certainly the most amorous, of figures within the condom history, had already begun the first condom quality tests: blowing them up with air to check for holes.<\/p>\n

By the 1900s, the future of the condom was set on a steady course, becoming cheaper, and thus more popular, due to rubber vulcanization creating a one-size-fits-all condom for the average Joe (or John).\u00a0 The history of the term however, still remained obscure. Thus, beginning in the 1900s, several etymological origins were proposed of French, Persian, Italian and Latin extraction.<\/p>\n

The French one seems to\u00a0have ended in a\u00a0cul-de-sac. Scholar Hans Ferdy, in 1904, proposed that \u201ccondom\u201d is eponymously named after the village of Condom in Southern France. Despite a cosmetic similarity however, there seems no deeper etymological reason to make the connection, and Ferdy himself discarded the idea in favor of the Latin word condus<\/i>, meaning, one who stores or preserves. While this seems true to the function of the device, Scholar William E. Kruck, in his seminal 1981 monograph \u201cLooking for Doctor Condom\u201d<\/i>, in which he searches for the word\u2019s origins, determined that condus<\/i> had died out of popular usage by 500AD.<\/p>\n

Paul Richter, in 1911, attempted a more exotic origin, proposing that word condom\u2019s precursor was the Persian kond\u00fc<\/i> or kend\u00fc<\/i>, which means an earthen grain-storage vessel. Richter claimed further that the word matriculated into English through Greek and eventually Latin translations. However, the aforementioned WM Kruck, ever the pessimist, holds no truck with Richter\u2019s explanation. Kruck, noting that the contraceptive abilities of condoms were realized far after the initial purpose of disease prevention, reasons that Richter\u2019s usage would be anachronistic. Further, Kruck insists that though the Greek \u201cKondom\u201d, which refers to a seed storage pot, is possibly a predecessor of condom, the relationship to the Persian kond\u00fc<\/i> is purely coincidental.<\/p>\n

Again returning to the indefatigable Kruck, it seemed that, having exhausted the other options, Kruck, researching Latin-English dictionaries found a Latin connection in the word condum<\/i>, meaning a cup or pot. However, unable to trace the origins beyond the word condum,<\/i> itself being a derivation of some previous work, Kruck let the matter drop there, concluding rather dispiritedly that the origin of the word was unknown and was ultimately, not Latin. Kruck\u2019s final suggestion was to include among the possible contenders for condom\u2019s origins, \u201cconundrum: a riddle, difficult to put on\u201d.<\/p>\n

Kruck\u2019s effort notwithstanding, research into the etymology of condom has continued undaunted. Among the outstanding contenders are the Italian guantone<\/i>, a relative of the word guanto<\/i>, or glove. Also throwing its hat in the ring is the Latin, conduma<\/i>, as proposed in 1985 by the magisterially named Zacharias P. Thundy. Thundy, attempting to finish what Kruck could not, finds conduma<\/i>, a conjunction of con<\/i> (with) and duma<\/i> (dome) to be the likely, euphemistic ancestor of the word \u201ccondom\u201d. Finally, Aine Collier, gives the word \u201ccondom\u201d its most recent paternity test in her 2007 work, The Humble Little Condom<\/i><\/a> proposes that condom is a bastardization of the Latin cumdum<\/i>, which means \u201cscabbard\u201d or \u201csheath.<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n