{"id":43168,"date":"2015-09-14T06:36:11","date_gmt":"2015-09-14T13:36:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=43168"},"modified":"2015-09-14T06:36:11","modified_gmt":"2015-09-14T13:36:11","slug":"the-story-of-zero","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2015\/09\/the-story-of-zero\/","title":{"rendered":"The Story of Zero"},"content":{"rendered":"
The following is an article from Uncle John\u2019s Bathroom Reader<\/a><\/em><\/div>\n

Aristotle didn\u2019t have it. Neither did Pythagoras or Euclid or other ancient mathematicians. We\u2019re talking about zero, which may sound like nothing, but, as it turns out, is a really big something. Here\u2019s the story.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"al-ge-bra\"<\/a>COUNT LIKE A HINDU<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sometime in the early 9th century, a Persian mathematician named Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi (circa A.D. 780\u2013850) gained a key piece of knowledge that would eventually earn him the nickname \u201cthe Father of Algebra.\u201d What he discovered would also speed up mathematical calculation many times over and, eventually, make a host of amazing technological advances possible, up to and including cars, computers, space travel, and robots.<\/p>\n

What was it? The Hindu number system (developed in India). The system intrigued al-Khwarizmi because it used nine different symbols to represent numbers, plus a small circle around empty space to represent shunya\u2014\u201cnothingness.\u201d To keep from having to use more and more symbols for larger numbers, the Hindu system was a place system. The value of a number could be determined by its place in a row of numbers: There was a row for 1s, a row for 10s, 100s, 1000s, and so on. If nine numerals and a circle to represent \u201cnothing\u201d sounds familiar, it should. Thanks to al-Khwarizmi, the Hindu number system (known in the West as \u201cArabic numerals\u201d) is the system used in most of the world today.<\/p>\n

A ZERO IN THE HOUSE OF WISDOM<\/strong><\/p>\n

Al-Khwarizmi knew a good idea when he saw one. He was a scholar and worked in the House of Wisdom, a combination library, university, research lab, and translation service in Baghdad. At the time, the Abbassid caliphs\u2014who claimed to be descendants of Abbas, the prophet Muhammad\u2019s youngest uncle\u2014ruled the Persian Empire. They had turned their seat of power, Baghdad, into the \u201cjewel of the world.\u201d Muhammad had exhorted his followers to \u201cacquire knowledge\u201d and to \u201cseek learning though it be as far as China.\u201d So as Europe descended into the Dark Ages, the caliphs kept the light of knowledge burning bright. They collected as much of the world\u2019s written knowledge as they could get their hands on and had it translated into Arabic. At a time when the largest library in Europe contained far fewer than a thousand volumes, the Abbasids amassed a library believed to have held a million books.<\/p>\n

While working for the Abbasids in the House of Wisdom, al-Khwarizmi specialized in astronomy and mathematics. He spent most of his time finding useful real-world applications for mathematical concepts and explaining them in ways that reasonably-intelligent non-mathematicians could understand. Those Hindu numbers opened up a whole new world of mathematical possibility. And he was especially intrigued by the symbol for \u201cnothing.\u201d<\/p>\n

HOLD THAT PLACE!<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe tenth figure in the shape of a circle,\u201d al-Khwarizmi wrote, would help prevent confusion when it came to balancing household accounts or parceling out a widow\u2019s dowry. The circle was the key: If no numeral fell into a particular column, the circle served as a placeholder, as al-Khwarizmi put it, \u201cto keep the rows straight.\u201d A merchant (or mathematician) could run his finger down each column starting from the right and be confident that the 1s, 10s, 100s, and so on, were in the correct place.<\/p>\n

If this seems less than Earth-shaking, consider this: The Hindu system was based on the abacus, a counting device that some scholars say goes back 3000 B.C. The earliest versions used pebbles lined up in columns to represents 1s, 10s, 100s, 1000s, etc. Later versions used beads strung on wires inside a frame. With this type of abacus, when you counted past nine, you flipped one bead into the 10s column and pushed the beads in the 1s column back to nothing. British mathematician Lancelot Hogben succinctly explained what was so amazing about the Hindu circle:<\/p>\n

The invention of sunya (zero) liberated the human intellect from the prison bars of the counting frame. Once there was a sign for the empty column, \u2018carrying over\u2019 on a slate or paper was just as easy as carrying over on the abacus\u2026and it could stretch as far as necessary in either direction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That, in a nutshell, is the humble beginning of zero. But a circle used as a placeholder is only half of the story about nothing.<\/p>\n

ZERO HOUR<\/strong><\/p>\n

For awhile, the Hindu circle remained a placeholder doing nothing more than showing that there was nothing in a particular column. But al-Khwarizmi wasn\u2019t content with that and went back to the books. He studied everything he could find about math from the ancient Greeks and others, and he began considering the existence of negative numbers, in particular what happens when you subtract a larger number from a smaller one. Something about the available literature bugged him. There was something missing.<\/p>\n

Take a problem like 3 – 4 =___. Everybody had figured out that the answer was -1. But al-Khwarizmi knew that he couldn\u2019t arrive at that answer by starting at 3 and counting backward by 4 numbers. When he did that\u20262, 1, -1, -2\u2026the fourth number was -2, and that\u2019s the wrong answer.<\/p>\n

Al-Khwarizmi\u2019s \u201cAh-ha!\u201d moment came when he realized that there was a missing number, one that signified \u201cnothing.\u201d And\u2014Eureka!\u2014a symbol for nothing was already there in the Hindu system, stuck at the end of numerals like 10, 20, 30, and 100, to indicate the numeral\u2019s place in a column of figures. That circle signifying \u201cnothing\u201d (sunya in Sanskrit, sifr in Arabic, and, in time, cipher in Latin) needed to be upgraded from a placeholder to a full-fledged numeral. Al-Khwarizmi gave zero its rightful place: right between +1 and -1. He began using the round placeholder (0) as the missing number in calculations, and suddenly math with negative numbers worked. (His zero also provoked heated philosophical discussions along the line of: \u201cHow can nothing be represented by something?\u201d but that\u2019s a different topic.)<\/p>\n

ALGEBRA 1<\/strong><\/p>\n

Around A.D. 825, al-Khwarizmi wrote a book to explain calculation using the Hindu number system. It was called, fittingly, On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals<\/em>. But al-Khwarizmi didn\u2019t rest on his zeroes; he expanded his work, developing math that included rational and irrational numbers, negatives, equations, and all the other stuff you\u2019ve forgotten from ninth grade.<\/p>\n

Around A.D. 830, he wrote al-Kitab al-mukhtasar fi hisab al-jabr wa\u2019l-muqabala<\/em> (The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing<\/em>). The title gave the world the term \u201calgebra\u201d (from al-jabr), and the content gave the world the advanced math that went with it. Al-Khwarizmi\u2019s intent wasn\u2019t to confuse future generations of middle school students with abstract equations. In his own words, it was to explain\u2026<\/p>\n

\u2026what is easiest and most useful in arithmetic, such as men constantly require in cases of inheritance, legacies, partition, lawsuits, and trade, and in all their dealings with one another, or where the measuring of lands, the digging of canals, geometrical computation, and other objects of various sorts and kinds are concerned.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Al-Khwarizmi\u2019s books became popular throughout the Persian Empire, and not just with mathematicians. Storekeepers, bankers, builders, architects, and anyone else who needed math to do their jobs made use of Hindu numbers and al-Khwarizmi\u2019s algebra. But it would take a surprisingly long time before his concepts spread beyond the Muslim world and into Europe.<\/p>\n

A POPE FAILS TO CONVERT<\/strong><\/p>\n

Despite the biblical injunction to \u201cgo forth and multiply,\u201d convincing Christians to use this more advanced system of mathematics would take about 1,000 years. In al-Khwarizmi\u2019s time (late 8th-to mid-9th century), the Muslim world was in the middle of a golden age of learning. The Christian world: Not so golden. When the Roman Empire collapsed in A.D. 476, in the words of one modern historian, it was as if \u201cWestern Civilization went camping for five hundred years.\u201d<\/p>\n

During the Middle Ages, much of the Christian world considered Muslims to be \u201cheretics\u201d who rejected the \u201ctrue faith.\u201d What, then, could be learned from them? In the minds of most Europeans, the answer was an unequivocal \u201cnothing.\u201d When it came to math, there was one notable exception: the 10th-century French monk, Gerbert of Aurillac. As a young monk, Gerbert had traveled to Muslim-controlled Spain to study advanced science, astronomy, and mathematics\u2014disciplines that had been virtually lost to the Western world. He discovered \u201cArabic numerals,\u201d learned how to use an abacus, and studied algebra. Gerbert couldn\u2019t wait to get back and share this knowledge. One man in particular was interested: Otto the Great, the Holy Roman Emperor. Otto took 20-year-old Gerbert into his court to tutor his 16-year-old heir, Otto II, in what was then called \u201cmathesis.\u201d Otto II wasn\u2019t much of a scholar, but he knew a good teacher when he saw one. When his own heir, Otto III, needed a tutor, Gerbert was his man.<\/p>\n

Over time Gerbert became an astronomer, organ builder, music theoretician, mathematician, philosopher, teacher, and\u2026the world\u2019s first French pope\u2014Sylvester II. In 999 Otto III, in his new role as emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, used his influence to get his former teacher elected to the papacy. Gerbert saw his election as an opportunity to introduce Arabic numerals into the Church, replacing those unwieldy Roman numerals. Bad idea: Using Arabian \u201csquiggles\u201d to do math was, to many, a suspicious indication that Sylvester II had gone over to the dark side. Rumors spread that while in Spain the future pope had either learned the \u201cmagic\u201d we call math from his teacher\u2019s secret book of magic\u2026or studied with the Devil himself.<\/p>\n

Whispers that Gerbert\u2019s math was a tool of Satan followed him into the papacy, and though he frequently displayed his abacus skills and wrote treatises on Arabic math, he died (in 1003) without convincing either the Church or the masses to adopt Arabic numerals. In 1096, just before the First Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Muslims began, the deceased pope was, according to The Abacus and the Cross<\/em> by Nancy Marie Brown, \u201cbranded a sorcerer and devil-worshipper for having taught the mathematics and science that had come to Christian Europe from Islamic Spain.\u201d<\/p>\n

ENTER FIBONACCI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Arabic numerals (and zero) made their next significant appearance in Western civilization nearly 200 years after Gerbert\u2019s death, courtesy of Leonardo Fibonacci. Born in Pisa to a wealthy Italian merchant around 1170, Fibonacci is said to have been the best Western mathematician of the Middle Ages (not that he had a lot of competition). Leonardo was raised in northern Africa where his father oversaw Italy\u2019s coastal trading outposts and made sure his son was schooled in the math he would need to become an accountant. His Arab teachers showed him al-Khwarizmi\u2019s Hindu-Arabic number system. \u201cWhen I had been introduced to the art of the Indians\u2019 nine symbols, knowledge of the art very soon pleased me above all else,\u201d he later wrote.<\/p>\n

As a young man, Fibonacci traveled enough to encounter other number systems being used in the West, including the awkward Roman numeral system still reigning in Europe. (He also traveled enough to earn the nickname Bigollo, which means \u201cvagabond\u201d or \u201cwanderer.\u201d) To Fibonacci, the Hindu-Arabic system he\u2019d learned in the Arab world was far superior. He returned to Pisa as an adult and, in 1202, published Liber Abaci<\/em> (Book of Calculation<\/em>) to share the knowledge of how to use the Hindu-Arabic system in practical ways, including the conversion of measures and currency, allocation of profit, and the computation of interest. Italian merchants and bankers loved it. Soon most of them had switched over to the new system.<\/p>\n

MUCH ADO ABOUT ZERO<\/strong><\/p>\n

That didn\u2019t end the push back against Arabic numerals. In 1259 an edict came from Florence forbidding bankers to use \u201cthe infidel symbols,\u201d and in 1348 the University of Padua insisted that book prices be listed using \u201cplain\u201d letters (Roman numerals), not \u201cciphers\u201d (al-Khwarizmi\u2019s sifr). Though Fibonacci\u2019s book is credited with bringing the zero (as well as its buddies, 1 to 9) to Europe, it took another 300 years for the system to spread beyond Italy. Why? For one thing, Fibonacci lived in the days before printing, so his books were hand written. If someone wanted a copy, it had to be copied by hand. In time, Fibonacci\u2019s book would be translated, plagiarized, and used as inspiration for books in many other languages. The first one in English was The Crafte of Nombrynge<\/em>, published around 1350.<\/p>\n

Zero finally came into its own in Europe during the Renaissance when it showed up in a variety of books, including Robert Recordes\u2019s popular math textbook Ground of Artes (1543). That book may have been read by one William Shakespeare, the first writer known to have used the Arabic zero in literature. In King Lear<\/em>, the Fool tells Lear, \u201cThou art a 0 without a figure. I am better than thou art now, I am a Fool, thou art nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n

MEANWHILE\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lest we forget, advanced knowledge also developed in the New World independently of Old World thought. The zero appears on a Mayan stela (a stone monument) carved sometime between 292 and A.D. 372. That\u2019s about 500 years before al-Khwarizmi \u201cdiscovered\u201d it.<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/a>This article is reprinted with permission from Uncle John’s Fully Loaded 25th Anniversary Bathroom Reader<\/a><\/em>. This behemoth of a book is overflowing with the incredible stories, surprising facts, weird news, little-known origins, fun wordplay, and everything else the millions of loyal fans have come to expect from the world’s best-selling bathroom reading series.<\/p>\n

Since 1987, the Bathroom Readers\u2019 Institute<\/a> has led the movement to stand up for those who sit down and read in the bathroom (and everywhere else for that matter). With more than 15 million books in print, the Uncle John\u2019s Bathroom Reader series is the longest-running, most popular series of its kind in the world.<\/p>\n

If you like Today I Found Out<\/a>, I guarantee you’ll love the Bathroom Reader Institute’s books, so check them out<\/a>!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The following is an article from Uncle John\u2019s Bathroom Reader Aristotle didn\u2019t have it. Neither did Pythagoras or Euclid or other ancient mathematicians. We\u2019re talking about zero, which may sound like nothing, but, as it turns out, is a really big something. Here\u2019s the story. COUNT LIKE A HINDU Sometime in the early 9th century, a Persian mathematician named Muhammad […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":179,"featured_media":43170,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-today-i-found-out","category-history"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/179"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43168"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43168\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43171,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43168\/revisions\/43171"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}