{"id":42497,"date":"2015-08-07T00:00:08","date_gmt":"2015-08-07T07:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=42497"},"modified":"2020-10-18T11:35:18","modified_gmt":"2020-10-18T18:35:18","slug":"this-day-in-history-august-7th-johannes-kepler-and-his-mother-the-witch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2015\/08\/this-day-in-history-august-7th-johannes-kepler-and-his-mother-the-witch\/","title":{"rendered":"This Day in History: August 7th- Johannes Kepler and His Mother the Witch"},"content":{"rendered":"

This Day In History<\/a>: August 7, 1620<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"kepler\"<\/a>On the night of August 7, 1620, an elderly German herbalist woman was torn from her bed, imprisoned, and charged with witchcraft. The primary evidence?\u00a0 Supposedly giving a woman name\u00a0Ursula Reingold a potion which made her sick. These sorts of accusations were often thrown about at this time, sometimes with fatal results for the accused, but what separates this woman from so many others with similar stories is that she was the mother of Johannes Kepler.<\/p>\n

Johannes Kepler was a major figure in the history of science, among many other contributions coming up with his laws of planetary motion. Less well known is that he also authored what is often called (incorrectly, see Bonus<\/span> Fact below) the first science fiction novel, Somnium<\/em>, \u201cThe Dream\u201d in which Kepler narrates a dream where an herbalist witch and her astronomer son learn from a daemon what it’s like living on the Moon and offers to take them there.<\/p>\n

Despite having written the basic story of the book in the 1590s and finishing it a couple decades later, Kepler did not publish it. (It was eventually published in 1634, four years after his death.)<\/p>\n

Why didn’t he publish the story? Some of the elements of\u00a0Somnium<\/em> struck a little too close to home.\u00a0 In fact, Kepler believed this work had been copied and become something gossiped about, which served as the spark for his mother being accused of witchcraft. He stated,<\/p>\n

If I am not mistaken the author of that insolent satire called Ignatius, His Conclave [John Donne], got hold of a copy of this little work of mine, he stings me by name at the very beginning… You, my friends, who have some knowledge of my affairs, and know the cause of my last trip to Swabia, especially those of you who have previously seen this manuscript, will judge that this writing and those affairs were ominous for me and mine. Nor do I disagree. Ominous indeed is the infliction of a deadly wound or the drinking of poison; and the spreading abroad of this writing seems to have been equally ominous for my domestic affairs. You would think a spark had fallen on dry wood; that is, that my words had been taken up by dark minds which suspect everything else of being dark.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This brings us to another myth surrounding Somnium<\/em>. Over time Kepler’s suspicions here have morphed into the commonly stated “fact,” even among many otherwise reputable sources, that Somnium<\/em> was the primary evidence used against Ma Kepler in the trial. In fact, the work was never brought up in the proceedings. Beyond that, there is no evidence to support Kepler’s suspicion that the story was the “spark” that ultimately got her arrested (not the only such seemingly unfounded paranoid musing known to exist by Kepler).<\/p>\n

The fact that the work was never brought up in the lengthy trial of his mother would even perhaps indicate that nobody involved in prosecuting Kepler’s mother knew anything about the story.\u00a0 After all, Kepler himself writing a tale in which two characters who seem to be representing Kepler and his mother, and that mother figure being an unabashed witch capable of summoning daemons, would have been seen as slam dunk evidence against his dear old mom in these types of witch hunt trials. So had the story been known of by those accusing her or the prosecution, you better believe they’d have used it as evidence against her.<\/p>\n

As for the woman herself, Katharina Kepler was, by all accounts, a cantankerous old woman. She was also an herbalist and, while rumored to have been a substandard mother to her children in their youth, appears to have at least gifted one of her sons with a love of the natural world. Seemingly thinking her arrest had something to do with his story, when Katharina was faced with 49 charges of practicing the \u201cforbidden arts\u201d, Johannes dropped everything and came to her defense.<\/p>\n

This was a good thing as the danger here was very real. Six women in her town had been burned for witchcraft in 1615 alone. Her son clearly had to tread very carefully as he handled her defense and prepared all her briefs.<\/p>\n

In the end, having a highly intelligent and well respected son devising her defense worked out for Katharina and the evidence against her was declared to be insufficient. But they couldn\u2019t let the poor old woman go without a big demonstration of what could have been her fate. In a last ditch effort to see if perhaps she really was guilty, despite the lack of evidence, they decided to convince her they were going to torture her if she didn’t confess (territio verbalis).<\/p>\n

According to James Connor in his book Kepler\u2019s Witch<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cEarly that morning, she was led to the torturer by Aulber, the bailiff of G\u00fcglingen, who was accompanied by a scribe for recording her confession, and three court representatives. The torturer, with the bailiff standing to one side, then shouted at her for a long time, commanding her to repent and tell the truth and threatening her if she didn\u2019t. He showed her each instrument and described in detail all that it would do to her body \u2014 the prickers, the long needles for picking at the flesh; the hot irons for branding; the pincers for pulling and tearing at the body; the rack; the garrote; and the gallows for hanging, drawing, and quartering. He adjured her to repent, to confess her crimes, so that even if she would not survive in this world, she could at least go to God with a clear conscience.<\/p>\n

Katharina remained unmoved and replied:<\/p>\n

\u201cDo with me what you want. Even if you were to pull one vein after another out of my body, I would have nothing to admit.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Having no real evidence against her and failing to get a confession after their little torture bluff, she was released six days later in October of 1621.<\/p>\n

Katharina Kepler died of natural causes the following April.<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n