{"id":31104,"date":"2014-03-26T00:05:41","date_gmt":"2014-03-26T07:05:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=31104"},"modified":"2015-11-23T12:20:38","modified_gmt":"2015-11-23T20:20:38","slug":"native-americans-didnt-wipe-europeans-diseases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2014\/03\/native-americans-didnt-wipe-europeans-diseases\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Native Americans Didn’t Wipe Out Europeans With Diseases"},"content":{"rendered":"
Greg H. asks: Diseases from Europe wiped out most of the Indians, so why didn’t the Europeans also get wiped out by diseases from America?<\/div>\n

\"native-american-disease\"<\/a>While estimates vary, approximately 20-50 million people are believed to have lived in the Americas shortly before Europeans arrived. Around 95% of them were killed by European diseases. So why didn’t 19 out of 20 Europeans die from Native American diseases?<\/p>\n

The short answer is that Europeans simply had more robust immune systems. Several factors contributed to this: first, Europeans had been the caretakers of domestic animals for thousands of years, and had over time grown (somewhat) immune to the common diseases that accompanied the domestication of such food sources. Native Americans, on the other hand, were largely hunters and gatherers, and even in some domestication cases, it’s thought exposure was limited.\u00a0 For instance, as Jared Diamond, author of Guns, Germs, and Steel<\/i> <\/a>states,<\/p>\n

The Incas had llamas, but llamas aren\u2019t like European cows and sheep. They\u2019re not milked, they\u2019re not kept in large herds, and they don\u2019t live in barns and huts alongside humans. There was no significant exchange of germs between llamas and people.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Second, Europeans lived in more densely populated areas than Native Americans. When so many humans live together in relatively close quarters (particularly with lack of good, or any, sewage systems and the like), disease spreads quickly with the general population continually getting exposed to numerous pathogens. The Europeans\u2019 bodies had to adapt to dealing with many of those diseases, and for those who survived, their immune systems thrived as a result.<\/p>\n

The third factor is travel and exchange. Groups of people and animals moved around a lot in Europe and had interactions particularly through war and trade, resulting in the spread of disease across continents\u2014and, eventually, some level of immunity for the survivors.<\/p>\n

All of these things resulted in Europeans being regularly exposed to many more pathogens than Native Americans were. The Europeans\u2019 immune systems simply developed to ward off the worst of some of the nastier diseases that incapacitated entire Native American populations. That same immunity protected them from diseases that Native Americans might have given them, or at least made it so the new diseases that they encountered were not as deadly.<\/p>\n

That said, it should be noted that Europeans were also commonly killed off by the diseases they brought to the New World. It’s just that over time those who were more susceptible to these diseases died off and the survivors’ immune systems had developed to the point where the general populace wasn’t typically being wiped out at rates anywhere close to 95%, though the numbers were often still extreme by today’s standards.<\/p>\n

But contrary to popular belief, it wasn’t all one sided.\u00a0 It\u2019s believed that one Native American disease did slip on to the European ships and sailed onward to Europe doing some major damage in the process.\u00a0 That disease was syphilis.<\/p>\n

Columbus \u201csailed the ocean blue\u201d in 1492. Just three years later, in 1495, the first syphilis epidemic broke out among armies in Italy at the Siege of Naples, seemingly brought by French soldiers who in turn probably got the disease from Spanish mercenaries. Because of the French popularly spreading it, syphilis was initially known as the “French disease.”<\/p>\n

There was up until very recently some debate about whether or not syphilis was in fact a \u201cNew World\u201d disease because there are over 50 skeletons that have been found with all the markings of syphilis being the cause of death and that were once thought to date to pre-Columbian times. However, advancements in dating technology and a recent (2011) comprehensive study published in the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology<\/em> looking at all of the skeletons placed those people’s deaths after Columbus returned from the Americas.<\/p>\n

The initial syphilis epidemic is thought to have killed upwards of a few million Euopeans as it made its rounds. Artist Albrecht D\u00fcrer remarked,<\/p>\n

God save me from the French disease. I know of nothing of which I am so afraid \u2026 Nearly every man has it and it eats up so many that they die.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The disease continued to be a problem into the 20th<\/sup> century. It\u2019s caused by bacteria Treponema pallidum<\/i>, which can attack the nervous system, heart, brain, and internal organs, causing a variety of health problems and, sometimes, death. A cure wasn\u2019t developed until the 1940s with the development of penicillin.<\/p>\n

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunes<\/a>, Spotify<\/a>, Google Play Music<\/a>, Feed<\/a>), as well as:<\/p>\n