{"id":12727,"date":"2012-08-28T00:01:48","date_gmt":"2012-08-28T07:01:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/?p=12727"},"modified":"2012-12-02T22:06:16","modified_gmt":"2012-12-03T06:06:16","slug":"birds-wont-die-if-they-eat-rice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.todayifoundout.com\/index.php\/2012\/08\/birds-wont-die-if-they-eat-rice\/","title":{"rendered":"Birds Won’t Die if They Eat Rice"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Myth: You shouldn’t throw rice at weddings because birds’ stomachs will rupture if they eat it.<\/p>\n

In fact, birds can eat as much rice as they want (and some do, such as the bobolink, waterfowl, and shorebirds) without any internal problems.\u00a0 This shouldn’t be too surprising given rice is just a seed and birds eat a lot of seeds with no ill effects.\u00a0 Now you might say, “Yes, rice is a seed, but rice that is thrown at weddings is dried and somewhat highly processed, so your comparison doesn’t necessarily hold.”\u00a0 True, so to answer whether instant and other types of dried rice hurts birds, we’ll have to turn to science!<\/p>\n

Specifically, we’ll look at a 2002 study done by biologist Jim Krupa of the University of Kentucky that was later published in a 2005 edition of the journal, The American Biology Teacher<\/em>.\u00a0 Krupa was inspired to do a study on birds and rice after an almost even split occurred among his 600 students when he asked them if throwing rice at weddings was harmful to birds (45% thought the rice would kill the birds).<\/p>\n

They started by experimenting with the expansion of various grains that birds commonly ate in order to see what the birds’ systems could handle.\u00a0 What they found was that typical bird seed (the type that is now sometimes thrown at many weddings owing to the bird\/rice myth) actually expands more than rice, at 40% expansion over rice’s 33%.\u00a0 However, one type of rice did show pretty remarkable expansion, instant rice. Brown instant rice expanded at 240% its original volume and white instant rice expanded at 270%.<\/p>\n

Few people throw instant rice at weddings as it’s a lot more expensive than “regular” dried rice, but the question remained as to whether instant rice could burst birds’ bellies or other parts of their digestive system. Conceptually, it seems like instant rice wouldn’t be a problem given how long it takes even dried instant rice to absorb moisture at around a bird’s\u00a0 typical body temperature (for reference, pigeons sit around 100-110 degrees Fahrenheit or 37.7-43.3 degrees Celsius, depending on whether the birds are from the United States or pretty much everywhere else. ;-)).<\/p>\n

Given that it seemed to them safe enough to try from a conceptual standpoint, they decided to go ahead with testing instant rice out on real birds (Krupa owned 60 doves and pigeons), which he went ahead and fed a diet of nothing but instant rice and water for 12 hours, as much as they wanted.<\/p>\n

After 12 hours, the birds all lay dead at the bottom of their cages and Krupa was splashed with red paint by PETA after being fired for animal cruelty… Or… you know, the birds were all completely fine (which is what actually happened).\u00a0 Not only were they all not dead at the end of the day, but during the 12 hour period while they were munching on instant rice, the birds were closely monitored for any signs of distress.\u00a0 Not a single bird showed the slightest discomfort from eating the instant rice and, in fact, Krupa stated, “now they’re kind of addicted to it.”<\/p>\n

How the myth that rice will cause birds’ stomachs to explode started isn’t known, but it has been around at least since the 1980s.\u00a0 In 1985, a state representative from Connecticut, Mae S. Schmidle, decided to do what seemingly all politicians do all the time, namely pass laws that are based on subjects they are woefully ignorant about while not bothering to do any real research to educate themselves on it.\u00a0 Specifically, Schmidle attempted to pass a law forbidding people from being able to throw rice at weddings to “prevent injury and death of birds as a result of ingesting raw rice thrown at weddings”, called “An Act Prohibiting The Use Of Uncooked Rice At Nuptial Affairs”.\u00a0 The proposed penalty for breaking this law was to be a $50 fine.<\/p>\n

As she stated,<\/p>\n

The rice that’s left, that’s not in your hair or on your suit or in your bouquet, you leave for the birds.\u00a0 Unfortunately, when the birds eat the raw rice, they cannot digest it. When it gets in their stomachs, it expands and causes them to have violent deaths. I’ve heard from several ministers who say that the next morning after a wedding, they see all these birds toppled over because they got poisoned by the rice. [There is not a single documented instance of this ever happening.]<\/blockquote>\n

She also went on to state that she knew at least one other state that outlawed throwing rice at weddings for this reason.\u00a0 When asked which state, Schmidle replied that she didn’t know. (seriously)<\/p>\n

Several ornithologists came forward and expressed their extreme skepticism over Schmidle’s claims, such as Roland C. Clement, president of the Connecticut Ornithological Association, who stated, “It sounds crazy. I have 50 years of professional experience as a practicing ornithologist and I’ve never heard of such a thing before. Of course, there can always be a first time, but I would have to see some evidence before I would promote the idea.”\u00a0 As no such evidence could be produced,\u00a0 the bill was never passed.<\/p>\n

The myth got further traction thanks to Ann Landers, a.k.a. Esther Lederer.\u00a0 Her column on May 21, 1988 stated the following:<\/p>\n

Dear Ann Landers:\u00a0 I have never seen this issue raised in your column; but it is something that every prospective bride and groom should think about, especially those who love birds.<\/p>\n

I am getting married in September and I’d like to have birdseed thrown instead of rice.\u00a0 Hard, dry rice is harmful to birds.\u00a0 According to ecologists [Yes, you read that right, ecologists], it absorbs the moisture in their stomachs and kills them.\u00a0 How can I get this message across to my guests, without sounding like some kind of nut? [Too late]\u00a0 My fianc\u00e9 is a bird-lover, too, and says it’s OK with him if I say this in the invitation- K.M.M., Long Island<\/p>\n

Dear K.M.M.:\u00a0 A Connecticut lawyer has introduced a bill banning instant rice from weddings because it can indeed be lethal to wildlife.\u00a0 But to state this on the invitation would be in poor taste.\u00a0 Ask your bridesmaids and ushers to pass the word to as many guests as possible.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Landers later issued a retraction, citing a letter from Steve Sibley, a Cornell ornithologist who stated,<\/p>\n

Rice is not a threat to birds.\u00a0 It must be boiled before it will expand. Furthermore, all the food that birds swallow is ground up by powerful muscles and grit in their gizzards.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Just shy of a decade later, Landers once again printed the same myth, presumably forgetting all about her column and retraction from 1988.<\/p>\n

Despite the fact that rice is not harmful to birds, many churches still ban it for weddings, which perhaps has kept this myth going with people assuming the reason is that rice kills birds.\u00a0 The real reason for the banning has nothing to do with the health of our avian friends.\u00a0 Rather, it is due to rice being notoriously difficult to clean up if there aren’t a lot of birds around, particularly when there are additional weddings that day or the next day.\u00a0 Further, it can potentially provide something of a slipping hazard on smooth floors. Nobody wants to see the bride break her neck running down the aisle.<\/p>\n

Bonus<\/span> Facts:<\/p>\n